Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Sep;18(9):711-6.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10425.x.

Promotion criteria for clinician-educators

Ayse A Atasoylu  1 , Scott M Wright, Brent W Beasley, Joseph Cofrancesco Jr, David S Macpherson, Ty Partridge, Patricia A Thomas, Eric B Bass
Affiliations

Promotion criteria for clinician-educators

Ayse A Atasoylu et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: Department of medicine chairs have a critical role in the promotion of clinician-educators. Our primary objective was to determine how chairs viewed: 1) the importance of specific areas of clinician-educator performance in promotion decisions; and 2) the importance and quality of information on available measures of performance. A secondary objective was to compare the views of department chairs with those of promotion and tenure committee chairs.

Methods: In October 1997, a questionnaire was mailed to all department chairs in the United States and Canada asking them to rate the importance of 11 areas of clinician-educators' performance in evaluating them for promotion. We also asked them to rate 36 measures of performance. We compared their responses to a similar 1996 survey administered to promotion committee chairs.

Results: One hundred fourteen of 139 department chairs (82%) responded to the survey. When considering a clinician-educator for promotion, department chairs view teaching skills and clinical skills as the most important areas of performance, as did the promotion committee chairs. Of the measures used to evaluate teaching performance, teaching awards were considered most important and rated as a high-quality measure. When evaluating a clinician-educator's clinical skills, peer and trainee evaluation were considered as the most important measures of performance, but these were rated low in quality. Patient satisfaction and objective outcome measures also were viewed as important measures that needed improvement. Promotion committee chairs placed more emphasis on productivity in publications and external grant support when compared to department chairs.

Conclusion: It is reassuring that both department chairs and promotion committee chairs value teaching skills and clinical skills as the most important areas of a clinician-educator's performance when evaluating for promotion. However, differences in opinion regarding the importance of several performance measures and the need for improved quality measures may represent barriers to the timely promotion of clinician-educators.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Levinson W, Branch WT, Kroenke K. Clinician-educators in academic medical centers: a two-part challenge. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:59–64. - PubMed
    1. Osborne LM, Sostok M, Castellano PZ, Blount W, Branch WT. Recruiting and retaining clinician-educators: lessons learned from three programs. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(suppl 2):83–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacobs MB, Tower D. Enhancing the training of internal medicine residents at Stanford by establishing a model group practice and raising its clinician-educators' status. Acad Med. 1992;67:623–30. - PubMed
    1. Friedman RH, Pozen JT, Rosencrans AL, Eisenberg JM, Gertman PM. General internal medicine units in academic medical centers: their emergence and functions. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96:233–8. - PubMed
    1. Cantor JC, Cohen AB, Barker DC, Shuster AL, Reynolds RC. Medical educator's view on medical education reform. JAMA. 1991;265:1002–6. - PubMed