Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Sep;18(9):736-44.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20756.x.

Effect of a triage-based E-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care: a randomized controlled trial

Steven J Katz  1 , Cheryl A Moyer, Douglas T Cox, David T Stern
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of a triage-based E-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care: a randomized controlled trial

Steven J Katz et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: E-mail communication between patients and their providers has diffused slowly in clinical practice. To address concerns about the use of this technology, we performed a randomized controlled trial of a triage-based e-mail system in primary care. DESIGN AND PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Physicians in 2 university-affiliated primary care centers were randomized to a triage-based e-mail system promoted to their patients. E-mails from patients of intervention physicians were routed to a central account and parsed to the appropriate staff for response. Control group physicians and their patients did not have access to the system. We collected information on patient e-mail use, phone calls, and visit distribution by physician over the 10 months and performed physician and patient surveys to examine attitudes about communication.

Results: E-mail volume was greater for intervention versus control physicians (46 weekly e-mails per 100 scheduled visits vs 9 in the control group at the study midpoint; P <.01) but there were no between-group differences in phone volume (67 weekly phone calls per 100 scheduled visits vs 55 in the control group; P =.45) or rates of patient no-shows (5% in both groups; P =.77). Intervention physicians reported more favorable attitudes toward electronic communication than did control physicians but there were no differences in attitudes toward patient or staff communication in general. There were few between-group differences in patient attitudes toward electronic communication or communication in general.

Conclusions: E-mail generated through a triage-based system did not appear to substitute for phone communication or to reduce visit no-shows in a primary care setting. Physicians' attitudes toward electronic communication were improved, but physicians' and patients' attitudes toward general communication did not change. Growth of e-mail communication in primary care settings may not improve the efficiency of clinical care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Physician perceptions of benefits of using e-mail with patients.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Physician perceptions of level of “bother” with different types of patient e-mail.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Patient benefits and barriers to e-mail use with providers.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ball M, Lillis J. E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. Int J Med Inf. 2001;61:1–10. - PubMed
    1. Starr P. Health care reform and the new economy. Health Aff. 2000;19:23–32. - PubMed
    1. Kassirer J. Patients, physicians, and the Internet. Health Aff. 2000;19:115–23. - PubMed
    1. Cole JI, Suman M, Schramm P, et al. The UCLA Internet Report. Surveying the Digital Future. Year Two, 2001. Available at: http://ccp.ucla.edu/pdf/UCLA-Internet-Report-2001.pdf. Accessed June 25, 2003.
    1. The Harris Poll. Patient/physician online communication: many patients want it, would pay for it, and it would influence their choice of doctors and health plans. Harris Interactive Health Care News. 2002;2:1–4.

Publication types