Posterior capsule opacification after phacoemulsification: silicone CeeOn Edge versus acrylate AcrySof intraocular lens

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the rates and morphologic features of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after small-incision phacoemulsification and in-the-bag implantation of 2 foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) over an 18-month follow-up.

Setting: Departments of Ophthalmology, Hospital of Conegliano, Conegliano, and Maggiore Hospital of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Methods: In an open clinical study, 78 cataract patients were randomly selected to have implantation of a silicone CeeOn Edge (Pharmacia) or acrylate AcrySof (Alcon) IOL after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. All the patients were operated on using a standard technique and in-the-bag IOL implantation. One eye in each patient was studied. Morphologic evaluation of PCO was performed using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification software.

Results: At 18 months in the CeeOn Edge group, 36 eyes (90%) had a clear posterior capsule and 4 (10%) had PCO that did not affect visual acuity. In the AcrySof group, 26 eyes (68%) had a clear posterior capsule, 11 (29%) had PCO that did not affect visual acuity, and 1 (3%) had PCO with a decrease of 2 or more lines of visual acuity that required a neodymium:YAG laser capsulotomy. No eye developed Elschnig pearls or stretched folds in the bag. The postoperative best corrected visual acuity ranged from 0.8 to 1.0 in 96% in the CeeOn Edge group and in 92% in the AcrySof group. No IOL haze or discoloration was observed in the CeeOn Edge group. Mild IOL decentration and tilting occurred in 4 AcrySof eyes; however, no glistenings were found any AcrySof IOL.

Conclusions: Both the CeeOn Edge and AcrySof groups had a low incidence of PCO after an 18-month follow-up. The CeeOn Edge group had significantly less PCO than the AcrySof group. These results confirm that IOLs with square truncated edges create a barrier effect at the optic edge, reducing the overall incidence of PCO.