Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1992 Nov-Dec;12(6B):1983-8.

A randomized, comparative study of combination chemotherapies in advanced gastric cancer: 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) versus 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and 4'-epirubicin (FPEPIR). Kyoto Research Group for Chemotherapy of Gastric Cancer (KRGCGC)

No authors listed
  • PMID: 1295444
Clinical Trial

A randomized, comparative study of combination chemotherapies in advanced gastric cancer: 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) versus 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and 4'-epirubicin (FPEPIR). Kyoto Research Group for Chemotherapy of Gastric Cancer (KRGCGC)

No authors listed. Anticancer Res. 1992 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Sixty patients with inoperable or recurrent gastric cancers were randomly assigned into 2 treatment regimens: the FP regimen, consisting of cisplatin (CDDP, 50 mg/body, d1) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, 250 mg/body, d2-d5), or the FPEPIR regimen, CDDP+5-FU (FP) + 4'-epirubicin (EPIR, 30 mg/m2, d2), administered intravenously every 2 weeks. The objective responses were evaluated in 43 patients (FP: 21; FPEPIR: 22). The response rates were 24% (5PR/21) for FP and 27% (6PR/22) for FPEPIR. Objective responses were seen in 1 primary lesion and 4 metastatic lesions in patients on the FP regimen, and in 3 primary lesions and 4 metastatic lesions in patients on the FPEPIR regimen. The 6 month and 1 year survival rates were 34% and 13% for FP, and 55% and 27% for FPEPIR, respectively (not significant). Significantly higher survival rates were demonstrated in those patients with recurrent cancers (p < 0.01) and those who responded to the FPEPIR regimen (p < 0.05). Drug toxicities were assessed in 56 patients, and were in general mild and well tolerated. However, the FP regimen induced significantly less neutropenia (p < 0.01) and less complete alopecia (p < 0.01) than the did FPEPIR regimen. These results suggest that FPEPIR may be a more beneficial regimen for the treatment of gastric cancer than FP, and may be indicated for further clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources