Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jan;30(1):119-26.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1993-7. Epub 2003 Sep 3.

Assessment of cardiac preload and left ventricular function under increasing levels of positive end-expiratory pressure

Affiliations

Assessment of cardiac preload and left ventricular function under increasing levels of positive end-expiratory pressure

Thomas Luecke et al. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: (1) To assess the impact of high intrathoracic pressure on left ventricular volume and function. (2) To test the hypothesis that right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) and intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) represent cardiac preload and are superior to central venous pressure (CVP) or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). The validity of these parameters was tested by means of correlation with left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), the true cardiac preload.

Design: Prospective animal study.

Subjects: Fifteen adult sheep.

Interventions: All animals were studied before and after saline washout-induced lung injury, undergoing volume-controlled ventilation with increasing levels of PEEP (0, 7, 14 and 21 cmH2O, respectively).

Measurements and main results: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), stroke volume (LVSV) and LVEDV were measured using computed tomography. ITBV and RVEDV were obtained by the thermal dye dilution technique. At PEEP 21 cmH2O, LVSV significantly decreased compared to baseline, PEEP 0 and PEEP 7 cmH2O. LVEDV was maintained except for the highest level of PEEP, while LVEF remained unchanged. RVEDV and RVEF also remained unchanged. The overall correlation of RVEDV and ITBV with LVEDV was satisfactory ( r=0.56 and r=0.62, respectively) and clearly superior to cardiac filling pressures.

Conclusion: In the present study, (1) ventilation with increasing levels of PEEP did not alter RV function, while LV function was impaired at the highest level of PEEP; (2) unlike cardiac filling pressures, ITBV and RVEDV both provide valid estimates of cardiac preload even at high intrathoracic pressures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 Oct;124(4):382-6 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources