Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Nov;170(3):271-277.
doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1543-6. Epub 2003 Sep 2.

Attentional effects of nicotine and amphetamine in rats at different levels of motivation

Affiliations

Attentional effects of nicotine and amphetamine in rats at different levels of motivation

L Bizarro et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Nov.

Abstract

Rationale: The effects of drugs on performance of tasks used to assess attention might be confounded with changes in motivation. Few studies have investigated the role of motivational factors in such situations.

Objectives: To determine how changes in motivation for food influence performance of the 5-choice serial reaction time task and whether the effects of nicotine and amphetamine can be explained by motivational changes.

Methods: Male hooded Lister rats were trained to respond to a 1-s light stimulus presented randomly in one of five apertures in order to obtain food reinforcers. For three groups of rats (n=9-10), access to food was restricted to maintain body weights at 80, 90 or 95% of control weights. Saline and nicotine (0.025-0.2 mg/kg) were tested in each group, with and without pre-feeding (5 g). In a second experiment, saline and amphetamine (0.03-0.9 mg/kg s.c.) were tested without pre-feeding.

Results: High levels of motivation for food were associated with increases in anticipatory responses, fewer omission errors, shorter response latencies and completion of more trials, without change in accuracy. Nicotine, but not amphetamine, increased accuracy and the number of trials completed; whereas amphetamine, but not nicotine, increased omission errors. Both drugs decreased anticipatory responding at the largest doses tested. There were few interactions of motivational level with drug effects.

Conclusions: The improvements in performance produced by nicotine did not resemble the effect of increased motivation, but some effects of amphetamine resembled those of reducing the level of motivation for food. Motivational levels did not confound assessments of the attentional effects of the drugs in terms of response accuracy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1998 Mar;136(1):83-90 - PubMed
    1. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1998 Aug;138(3-4):266-74 - PubMed
    1. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Mar;118(2):195-205 - PubMed
    1. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1998 Nov;140(2):135-41 - PubMed
    1. Behav Brain Res. 2000 Dec 20;117(1-2):197-208 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources