Attentional effects of nicotine and amphetamine in rats at different levels of motivation
- PMID: 12955304
- DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1543-6
Attentional effects of nicotine and amphetamine in rats at different levels of motivation
Abstract
Rationale: The effects of drugs on performance of tasks used to assess attention might be confounded with changes in motivation. Few studies have investigated the role of motivational factors in such situations.
Objectives: To determine how changes in motivation for food influence performance of the 5-choice serial reaction time task and whether the effects of nicotine and amphetamine can be explained by motivational changes.
Methods: Male hooded Lister rats were trained to respond to a 1-s light stimulus presented randomly in one of five apertures in order to obtain food reinforcers. For three groups of rats (n=9-10), access to food was restricted to maintain body weights at 80, 90 or 95% of control weights. Saline and nicotine (0.025-0.2 mg/kg) were tested in each group, with and without pre-feeding (5 g). In a second experiment, saline and amphetamine (0.03-0.9 mg/kg s.c.) were tested without pre-feeding.
Results: High levels of motivation for food were associated with increases in anticipatory responses, fewer omission errors, shorter response latencies and completion of more trials, without change in accuracy. Nicotine, but not amphetamine, increased accuracy and the number of trials completed; whereas amphetamine, but not nicotine, increased omission errors. Both drugs decreased anticipatory responding at the largest doses tested. There were few interactions of motivational level with drug effects.
Conclusions: The improvements in performance produced by nicotine did not resemble the effect of increased motivation, but some effects of amphetamine resembled those of reducing the level of motivation for food. Motivational levels did not confound assessments of the attentional effects of the drugs in terms of response accuracy.
Similar articles
-
Differential effects of psychomotor stimulants on attentional performance in rats: nicotine, amphetamine, caffeine and methylphenidate.Behav Pharmacol. 2004 May;15(3):195-206. Behav Pharmacol. 2004. PMID: 15187577
-
Comprehensive deficits in performance of an attentional task produced by co-administering alcohol and nicotine to rats.Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003 Dec 11;72(3):287-95. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.08.004. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003. PMID: 14643946
-
Enhancement of a visual reinforcer by D-amphetamine and nicotine in adult rats: relation to habituation and food restriction.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Mar;235(3):803-814. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4796-1. Epub 2017 Dec 3. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018. PMID: 29199358
-
Interaction between natural motivational systems and those which respond to drugs of abuse.Appetite. 2003 Dec;41(3):333-4. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2003.06.001. Appetite. 2003. PMID: 14637333 Review.
-
Addictive drugs modify excitatory synaptic control of midbrain dopamine cells.Neuroreport. 2002 Feb 11;13(2):A29-33. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200202110-00003. Neuroreport. 2002. PMID: 11893925 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Effects of nicotine and mecamylamine on cognition in rhesus monkeys.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Sep;175(2):225-40. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1804-z. Epub 2004 Apr 27. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004. PMID: 15112030 Free PMC article.
-
Interaction of nicotinic and histamine H(3) systems in the radial-arm maze repeated acquisition task.Eur J Pharmacol. 2007 Aug 13;569(1-2):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.04.051. Epub 2007 May 22. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007. PMID: 17544392 Free PMC article.
-
Detrimental effects of acute nicotine on the response-withholding performance of spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar Kyoto rats.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Jun;231(12):2471-82. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3412-2. Epub 2014 Jan 11. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014. PMID: 24414609 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancement of attentional performance by selective stimulation of alpha4beta2(*) nAChRs: underlying cholinergic mechanisms.Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 May;35(6):1391-401. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.9. Epub 2010 Feb 10. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010. PMID: 20147893 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of d-amphetamine in an attention task in rodents.Behav Pharmacol. 2018 Sep;29(6):551-556. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000409. Behav Pharmacol. 2018. PMID: 29864032 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources