Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Oct;13(5):347-54.
doi: 10.1016/s0924-977x(03)00031-2.

Effects of coaching by community pharmacists on psychological symptoms of antidepressant users; a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effects of coaching by community pharmacists on psychological symptoms of antidepressant users; a randomised controlled trial

Oscar H Brook et al. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2003 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Community pharmacists strive to deliver pharmaceutical care to patients. At the moment, coaching of depressive primary care patients on taking their antidepressants (ADs) is not yet part of their standard care package.

Aims: To investigate the effects of coaching by community pharmacists on psychological symptoms.

Method: A randomised controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up.

Outcomes: psychological symptoms with the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL). Intention-to-treat (ITT) was performed with (1) last observation carried forward and (2) with group mean imputation (GMI).

Results: Analyses with LOCF and GMI resulted in different findings. The LOCF method revealed that at the 6-month follow-up, the intervention patients were less depressed and less anxious than the controls. The intervention was particularly effective in patients with lower levels of education who received pharmacist's coaching. However, ITT with the GMI method showed no differences in psychological symptoms. Differences between LOCF and GMI were explained by the selective attrition in the intervention arm (attrition intervention patients had lower initial SCL-item scores on depression and anxiety than the completers) and by the higher attrition rate in controls.

Conclusions: Our study indicates that the interpretation of the effects of an intervention on psychological symptoms can differ substantially by the way missing values are imputed. If both LOCF and GMI produce significant differences, efficacy can be concluded. If not, the effects based on ITT analyses with LOCF are based on artefacts. We recommend that positive intervention effects should only be reported when findings with LOCF and GMI are in accordance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources