Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Sep;41(9):4324-7.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4324-4327.2003.

Evaluation of three rapid methods for the direct identification of Staphylococcus aureus from positive blood cultures

Affiliations

Evaluation of three rapid methods for the direct identification of Staphylococcus aureus from positive blood cultures

Kimberle Chapin et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Sep.

Abstract

Staphylococci represent the most commonly encountered blood culture isolates. Differentiating Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) is important in guiding empirical therapy, especially since the majority of CoNS are contaminants. This study evaluated three rapid methods for the direct identification of S. aureus from blood cultures. A total of 157 patient blood cultures with gram stains showing gram-positive cocci in clusters were included. The following assays were evaluated: API RAPIDEC staph (API) (bioMerieux, Durham, N.C.), the tube coagulase test (TCT) read at 4 h, and peptide nucleic acid (PNA) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (AdvanDx, Woburn, Mass.). All assays yielded results of S. aureus or non-S. aureus. The direct rapid results were compared to results obtained with isolated colonies using the AccuProbe Staphylococcus aureus Culture Identification Test (Gen-Probe, San Diego, Calif.). API, TCT, and PNA FISH exhibited sensitivities of 96, 84, and 99% and specificities of 99, 100, and 100%, respectively. Direct identification testing by any of these three assays yielded acceptable performance and timely results. This ability to accurately detect S. aureus in blood cultures gives the physician information with which to initiate or tailor antimicrobial therapy. Coupled with direct susceptibility testing of positive blood culture broths, the patient and institution may experience improved outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Flowchart for work with positive blood cultures. Horizontal arrows indicate points at which the assay can be stopped in order to batch specimens. Abbreviations: BC, blood culture; sol'n, solution.

References

    1. Barenfanger, J., C. Drake, and G. Kacich. 1999. Clinical and financial benefits of rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1415-1418. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooke, R. P., and C. T. Jenkins. 1997. Comparison of commercial slide agglutination kits with a tube coagulase test for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus from blood culture. J. Clin. Pathol. 50:164-166. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davis, T. E., D. D. Fuller, and E. C. Aeschleman. 1992. Rapid, direct identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae from blood cultures using commercial immunologic kits and modified conventional tests. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15:295-300. - PubMed
    1. Doern, G. V., R. Vautour, M. Gaudet, and B. Levy. 1994. Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1757-1762. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirchoff, L. V., and J. N. Sheagren. 1985. Epidemiology and clinical significance of blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus. Infect. Control 12:479-486. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources