Small bolus injections of intravenous midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a study of 788 consecutive cases
- PMID: 12959275
- PMCID: PMC1364663
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb00417.x
Small bolus injections of intravenous midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a study of 788 consecutive cases
Abstract
1 A recent audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy carried out by the Royal College of Surgeons of England has shown that the majority of endoscopists use a bolus injection rather than a slow intravenous titration of benzodiazepine for intravenous sedation. In this study we have confirmed the theoretical premise that a reduced dose of midazolam is required when given as a bolus. A mean dose of 4.65 mg midazolam intravenously has been found to be effective and safe in sedating patients under 70 years (n = 552). The dose of midazolam needed is reduced in older patients: patients over 70 years (n = 236) needed a mean dose of 1.89 mg. 2 Topical pharyngeal anaesthesia was not required with these doses of midazolam, and it was our impression that the examination was equally well tolerated with a similar degree of anterograde amnesia as in the previous study. 3 Our data, together with the results of the audit, would suggest many endoscopists are employing unnecessarily large and at times potentially dangerous doses of intravenous sedation in elderly patients and that the vast majority of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies can be performed successfully, without topical pharyngeal anaesthesia, using a bolus injection techniquewith a reduced dosage of sedative agent.
Similar articles
-
Synergistic sedation with oral midazolam as a premedication and intravenous propofol versus intravenous propofol alone in upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in children: a prospective, randomized study.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006 Aug;43(2):195-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000228099.04702.39. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006. PMID: 16877984 Clinical Trial.
-
Midazolam-induced sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: assessment of endoscopist and patient satisfaction.Gastroenterol Nurs. 2003 Jul-Aug;26(4):164-7. doi: 10.1097/00001610-200307000-00007. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2003. PMID: 12920432
-
Efficiency of propofol versus midazolam and fentanyl sedation at a pediatric teaching hospital: a prospective study.Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jun;67(7):1067-75. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.038. Epub 2008 Mar 26. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008. PMID: 18367187
-
Sedation and monitoring in gastrointestinal endoscopy.Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1993;200:28-32. doi: 10.3109/00365529309101572. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1993. PMID: 8016567 Review.
-
Review article: premedication and intravenous sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1990 Apr;4(2):103-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1990.tb00455.x. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1990. PMID: 2104078 Review.
Cited by
-
Propofol alternatives in gastrointestinal endoscopy anesthesia.Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Oct;8(4):540-5. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.140893. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014. PMID: 25422614 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A comparison of dexmedetomidine sedation with and without midazolam for dental implant surgery.Anesth Prog. 2012 Summer;59(2):62-8. doi: 10.2344/11-11.1. Anesth Prog. 2012. PMID: 22822992 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources