Biomarkers, validation and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling
- PMID: 12959633
- DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200342120-00001
Biomarkers, validation and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling
Abstract
Four elements are crucial to successful pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling and simulation for efficient and effective rational drug development: (i) mechanism-based biomarker selection and correlation to clinical endpoints; (ii) quantification of drug and/or metabolites in biological fluids under good laboratory practices (GLP); (iii) GLP-like biomarker method validation and measurements and; (iv) mechanism-based PK/PD modelling and validation. Biomarkers can provide great predictive value in early drug development if they reflect the mechanism of action for the intervention even if they do not become surrogate endpoints. PK/PD modelling and simulation can play a critical role in this process. Data from genomic and proteomics differentiating healthy versus disease states lead to biomarker discovery and identification. Multiple genes control complex diseases via hosts of gene products in biometabolic pathways and cell/organ signal transduction. Pilot exploratory studies should be conducted to identify pivotal biomarkers to be used for predictive clinical assessment of disease progression and the effect of drug intervention. Most biomarkers are endogenous macromolecules, which could be measured in biological fluids. Many exist in heterogeneous forms with varying activity and immunoreactivity, posting challenges for bioanalysis. Reliable and selective assays could be validated under a GLP-like environment for quantitative methods. While the need for consistent reference standards and quality control monitoring during sample analysis for biomarker assays are similar to that of drug molecules, many biomarkers have special requirements for sample collection that demand a well coordinated team management. Bioanalytical methods should be validated to meet study objectives at various drug development stages, and possess adequate performance to quantify biochemical responses specific to the target disease progression and drug intervention. Protocol design to produce sufficient data for PK/PD modelling would be more complex than that of PK. Knowledge of mechanism from discovery and preclinical studies are helpful for planning clinical study designs in cascade, sequential, crossover or replicate mode. The appropriate combination of biomarker identification and selection, bioanalytical methods development and validation for drugs and biomarkers, and mechanism-based PK/PD models for fitting data and predicting future clinical endpoints/outcomes provide powerful insights and guidance for effective and efficient rational drug development, toward safe and efficacious medicine for individual patients.
Similar articles
-
Pharmacometrics: modelling and simulation tools to improve decision making in clinical drug development.Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2000 Jan-Mar;25(1):49-58. doi: 10.1007/BF03190058. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2000. PMID: 11032091
-
Biomarkers in drug discovery and development: from target identification through drug marketing.J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Apr;43(4):329-41. doi: 10.1177/0091270003252480. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003. PMID: 12723454 Review.
-
Use of pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic modelling for starting dose selection in first-in-human trials of high-risk biologics.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Feb;67(2):153-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03297.x. Epub 2008 Dec 11. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009. PMID: 19076987 Free PMC article.
-
The discovery and development of proteomic safety biomarkers for the detection of drug-induced liver toxicity.Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010 May 15;245(1):134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.02.011. Epub 2010 Feb 26. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010. PMID: 20219512 Review.
-
PK/PD modelling and simulations: utility in drug development.Drug Discov Today. 2008 Apr;13(7-8):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.01.003. Epub 2008 Mar 7. Drug Discov Today. 2008. PMID: 18405847 Review.
Cited by
-
Development of translational pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Jun;83(6):909-12. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.52. Epub 2008 Mar 26. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008. PMID: 18388873 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Modelling of the cancer cell cycle as a tool for rational drug development: A systems pharmacology approach to cyclotherapy.PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 May 3;13(5):e1005529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005529. eCollection 2017 May. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017. PMID: 28467408 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of a flow cytometry based chemokine internalization assay for use in evaluating the pharmacodynamic response to a receptor antagonist.J Transl Med. 2008 Dec 1;6:76. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-6-76. J Transl Med. 2008. PMID: 19046455 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
"Fit-for-purpose" method validation and application of a biomarker (C-terminal telopeptides of type 1 collagen) in denosumab clinical studies.AAPS J. 2009 Jun;11(2):385-94. doi: 10.1208/s12248-009-9115-2. Epub 2009 May 22. AAPS J. 2009. PMID: 19462251 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling in diabetes mellitus.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47(7):417-48. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200847070-00001. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008. PMID: 18563953 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources