[Risk factors for lymphatic metastasis from pT1 colorectal adenocarcinoma]
- PMID: 12961027
- DOI: 10.1007/s00292-003-0632-y
[Risk factors for lymphatic metastasis from pT1 colorectal adenocarcinoma]
Abstract
During the last 20 years, endoscopic removal of colorectal adenoma has become widely accepted as a replacement for removal by open surgery. Even colorectal adenocarcinomas are not excluded. The key question is when surgical treatment should still be preferred over endoscopic removal as the primary treatment. One good indicator is the frequency of lymph node metastasis, which should be compared with the overall risk involved in the surgical procedure itself. Histological examination allows subdivision of early colorectal adenocarcinomas into low-risk and high-risk groups. Classical parameters for a high-risk situation are lymphatic invasion, poor differentiation, and incomplete removal (R1). Additional risk factors that have recently been discussed are infiltration into the lower third of the submucosal layer (sm3) and dissociation (budding) of the tumour cells at the invasion front. Drawing on the literature and an analysis of our own patients, we demonstrate a positive correlation between these new markers and an elevated risk of the presence of lymph node metastasis.
Similar articles
-
Characteristics of early colorectal carcinoma with lymph node metastatic disease.Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Jul-Aug;55(85):1293-7. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008. PMID: 18795675
-
Budding as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma.Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 May;45(5):628-34. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6259-0. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002. PMID: 12004212
-
Metastatic potential of colorectal adenoma containing carcinoma determined by pre-operative assessment of morphology.Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Mar-Apr;44(14):452-7. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997. PMID: 9164518
-
Risk analysis of submucosal invasive rectal carcinomas for lymph node metastasis to expand indication criteria for endoscopic resection.Dig Endosc. 2013 May;25 Suppl 2:21-5. doi: 10.1111/den.12089. Dig Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23617644 Review.
-
The feasibility and reliability of sentinel node mapping in colorectal cancer.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Oct;31(8):854-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.05.011. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16005598 Review.
Cited by
-
No prognostic impact of isolated lymphovascular invasion after radical resection of rectal cancer--results of a multicenter observational study.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jul;22(7):749-56. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0220-8. Epub 2006 Nov 23. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007. PMID: 17123090
-
Colorectal carcinoma: the management of polyps, (neo)adjuvant therapy, and the treatment of metastases.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Dec;106(51-52):843-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0843. Epub 2009 Dec 18. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009. PMID: 20062582 Free PMC article.
-
[Standardized and structured histopathological evaluation of colorectal polyps: a practical checklist against the background of the new WHO classification].Pathologe. 2011 Jul;32(4):289-96. doi: 10.1007/s00292-011-1436-0. Pathologe. 2011. PMID: 21678043 Review. German.
-
Annex to Quirke et al. Quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: annotations of colorectal lesions.Virchows Arch. 2011 Jan;458(1):21-30. doi: 10.1007/s00428-010-0997-2. Virchows Arch. 2011. PMID: 21061132 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis—European recommendations.Virchows Arch. 2011 Jan;458(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s00428-010-0977-6. Virchows Arch. 2011. PMID: 21061133 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources