[Imaging diagnosis of medial and lateral orbital wall fractures. Sonography versus computed tomography]
- PMID: 12961070
- DOI: 10.1007/s10006-003-0477-9
[Imaging diagnosis of medial and lateral orbital wall fractures. Sonography versus computed tomography]
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a curved array scanner in the diagnosis of medial and lateral orbital wall fractures.
Material and methods: Fifty-three patients with the clinical diagnosis of an orbital trauma were investigated prospectively within a period of 16 months by CT and ultrasonography. The intraoperative findings were used as a reference.
Results: CT reached a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96% in the diagnosis of medial orbital wall fractures, while ultrasound yielded a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 96%. There was no significant difference found between CT and ultrasonography ( p=0.402). In the investigation of lateral orbital wall fractures, CT reached a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 87%, while ultrasonography yielded a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 95%. Ultrasonography achieved significantly better results than CT ( p=0.008).
Conclusion: The ultrasound investigation with a curved array scanner could be used as an additional method in the diagnosis of medial and lateral orbital wall fractures. Further technical improvements of the transducers need to be developed to increase the sensitivity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of medial orbital wall fractures.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of ultrasonography in determining medial and lateral orbital wall fractures with a curved-array scanner.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Apr;62(4):451-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.05.016. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15085512 Clinical Trial.
-
Intrarater reliability in the ultrasound diagnosis of medial and lateral orbital wall fractures with a curved array transducer.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jan;64(1):68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.09.014. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006. PMID: 16360859
-
Ultrasound versus computed tomography in the imaging of orbital floor fractures.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Feb;62(2):150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.01.004. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004. PMID: 14762746 Clinical Trial.
-
[Orbital fractures in children].J Fr Ophtalmol. 2011 Apr;34(4):265-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2010.11.009. Epub 2011 Mar 21. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2011. PMID: 21420194 Review. French.
-
[Orbital blow-out fractures].J Radiol. 2006 Jun;87(6 Pt 1):601-5. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(06)74053-7. J Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16788534 Review. French.
Cited by
-
A comparable study of the diagnostic performance of orbital ultrasonography and CBCT in patients with suspected orbital floor fractures.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016 Jul;45(6):20150311. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150311. Epub 2016 May 4. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27074346 Free PMC article.
-
[Interobserver variation of the sonographic diagnosis of orbital floor fractures and fractures of the infraorbital margin].Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2004 Nov;8(6):337-43. doi: 10.1007/s10006-004-0571-7. Epub 2004 Oct 21. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2004. PMID: 15503239 German.
-
[Sonography as a training tool for screening of dubious midfacial fractures].Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2004 Jul;8(4):244-9. doi: 10.1007/s10006-004-0535-y. Epub 2004 Mar 10. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2004. PMID: 15293120 German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical