Review
doi: 10.12968/jowc.2001.10.8.26116.
Understanding research: 2. Ensuring reliability and validity
Affiliations
- PMID: 12964336
- DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2001.10.8.26116
Item in Clipboard
Review
Understanding research: 2. Ensuring reliability and validity
J Wound Care.
2001 Sep.
No abstract available
Similar articles
-
Reliability and validity in research.Nurs Stand. 2006 Jul 12-18;20(44):41-5. doi: 10.7748/ns2006.07.20.44.41.c6560. Nurs Stand. 2006. PMID: 16872117 Review.
-
Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability.Nurs Outlook. 2006 Jan-Feb;54(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2004.12.004. Nurs Outlook. 2006. PMID: 16487776 Review. No abstract available.
-
Understanding research: 3. Critiquing findings and conclusions.J Wound Care. 2001 Oct;10(9):376-9. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2001.10.9.26118. J Wound Care. 2001. PMID: 12964283 No abstract available.
-
Randomization by cluster.Nurs Res. 1991 Nov-Dec;40(6):356-8. Nurs Res. 1991. PMID: 1956815 No abstract available.
-
Research considerations: power analysis and effect size.Medsurg Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(1):41-2. Medsurg Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18429540 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Pain after spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for clinical practice and research. Report of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Spinal Cord Injury Measures meeting.J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30(5):421-40. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2007.11753405. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007. PMID: 18092558 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
