Preclinical removable partial dentures curriculum survey
- PMID: 12964684
- DOI: 10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00005-6
Preclinical removable partial dentures curriculum survey
Abstract
Purpose: In 2001, a survey of U.S. dental schools was conducted to determine the curricular structure, teaching philosophies, and techniques used in preclinical removable partial denture (RPD) courses and to also establish what newer educational techniques and materials are currently being used by U.S. dental schools.
Materials and methods: The questionnaire was mailed to the chairpersons of the prosthodontic/restorative departments of 54 U.S. dental schools. Of these, 43 schools returned the completed survey, resulting in a response rate of 80%. The mean, median, and range of responses were computed where applicable.
Results: Results from this survey show that the mean student-to-faculty ratio in the preclinical RPD course was 12:1, with a median of 10:1 and a range of 6:1 to 27:1. The mean number of laboratory hours was 55, with a median of 50 and a range of 13.5 to 120. The mean number of lecture hours reported was 21, with a median of 20.5 and a range 10 to 60. The mean number of practical examinations was 2, with a median of 3 and a range of 0 to 8. The mean number of written examinations given was 2, with a median of 2 and a range of 1 to 6. Ninety-five percent of the schools have prosthodontists teaching this course. The mean number of months that this course is taught is 4.4 months, with a median of 4 and a range of 1.5 to 10. Fifty-five percent of the schools used the Hanau semiadjustable articulator. One hundred percent of the schools teach students to use a surveyor when designing an RPD, and 84% percent of the schools teach the Krol or the Kratochvil RPI design or a combination of the 2 designs.
Conclusions: Preclinical RPD educational programs vary from school to school, yet a large percentage of schools agree on certain topics. Only 19% of dental schools are incorporating new technologies, such as the use of the internet, in their preclinical RPD curriculum.
Similar articles
-
Preclinical complete dentures curriculum survey.J Prosthodont. 2003 Mar;12(1):37-46. doi: 10.1053/jpro.2003.1. J Prosthodont. 2003. PMID: 12677611
-
Removable partial denture education in U.S. dental schools.J Prosthodont. 2006 Jan-Feb;15(1):62-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00071.x. J Prosthodont. 2006. PMID: 16433654
-
Complete denture education in U.S. dental schools.J Prosthodont. 2005 Sep;14(3):191-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.03043.x. J Prosthodont. 2005. PMID: 16336237
-
Assessing dental students' competence: best practice recommendations in the performance assessment literature and investigation of current practices in predoctoral dental education.J Dent Educ. 2008 Dec;72(12):1405-35. J Dent Educ. 2008. PMID: 19056620 Review.
-
The influence of "new science" on dental education: current concepts, trends, and models for the future.J Dent Educ. 2007 Apr;71(4):450-62. J Dent Educ. 2007. PMID: 17468305 Review.
Cited by
-
Attitude of dental professionals toward cast partial denture: A questionnaire survey in India.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jan-Mar;20(1):104-109. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_304_19. Epub 2020 Jan 27. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020. PMID: 32089606 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources