False positive mammograms and detection controlled estimation
- PMID: 12968824
- PMCID: PMC1360940
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.00170
False positive mammograms and detection controlled estimation
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the causes of false positive in mammograms.
Data sources: Secondary data collected from extracts from computerized medical records from 1999 from five thousand patients at a single hospital in a medium-sized Southern city.
Study design: Retrospective analysis of electronic medical data on screening and diagnostic mammograms. Detection-controlled estimation (DCE) was used to compare the efficacy of alternative readers of mammogram films. Analysis was also conducted on follow-up exams of women who tested positive in the first stage of investigation. Key variables included whether the patient had had a prior mammogram, age of the patient, and identifiers for the individual physicians.
Data collection/extraction methods: Hospital maintains electronic medical records (EMR) on all patients. Extracts were performed on this EMR system under the guidance of clinical expertise. Data were collected for all women who had mammograms in 1999. Random samples were employed for screening mammograms, and all data was used for diagnostic mammograms.
Principal findings: Study results imply that access to a previous mammogram greatly reduces the incidence of false positives readings. This has important consequences for benefit-cost, and cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography. Were previous mammograms always available, the results imply the number of false positives would decrease by at least half. The results here also indicate that there is no reason to believe this decrease in false positive would be accompanied by an increase in the number of false negatives. Other attributes also affected the number of false positives. Mondays and Wednesdays appear to be more prone to false positives than the other days in the week. There is also some disparity in false positive outcomes among the five physicians studied. With respect to detection-controlled estimation, the results are mixed. With follow-up data, the DCE estimator appears to generate reasonable, robust results. Without follow-up data, however, the DCE estimator is far less precise.
Conclusions: Study results imply that access to a previous mammogram reduces by at least half the incidence of false positives readings. This has important consequences for benefit-cost, and cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography.
Similar articles
-
The effect of immediate reading of screening mammograms on medical care utilization and costs after false-positive mammograms.Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1464-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00660.x. Health Serv Res. 2007. PMID: 17610433 Free PMC article.
-
Compliance With Screening Mammography Guidelines After a False-Positive Mammogram.J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Sep;13(9):1032-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.03.016. Epub 2016 May 24. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27233908
-
Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Apr 7;96(7):529-38. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh083. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004. PMID: 15069115 Clinical Trial.
-
Screening and diagnostic mammograms: why the gold standard does not shine more brightly.Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;50(5 Pt 1):199-206. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2005. PMID: 16468469 Review.
-
The psychosocial consequences of mammography.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):131-8. doi: 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.131. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997. PMID: 9709289 Review.
Cited by
-
Leveraging system sciences methods in clinical trial evaluation: An example concerning African American women diagnosed with breast cancer via the Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas study.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jul 19;15:100411. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100411. eCollection 2019 Sep. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019. PMID: 31406947 Free PMC article.
-
Radiomic analysis of cohort-specific diagnostic errors in reading dense mammograms using artificial intelligence.Br J Radiol. 2025 Jan 1;98(1165):75-88. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae195. Br J Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39383202 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. “Analysis of Cancers Missed at Screening Mammography.”. Radiology. 1992;184(3):613–7. - PubMed
-
- Bradford WD, Kleit AN, Re RN, Krousel Wood MA. “Testing the Efficacy of Telemedicine: A Detection Controlled Estimation Approach.”. Health Economics. 2001;10(6):553–64. - PubMed
-
- Callaway MP, Boggis CRM, Astley SA, Hutt I. “The Influence of Previous Films on Screening Mammographic Interpretation and Detection of Breast Carcinoma.”. Clinical Radiology. 1997;52:527–9. - PubMed
-
- Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher S. “Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast Examinations.”. New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;338(16):1089–96. - PubMed
-
- Elmore JG, Wells CK, Howard DH. “Does Diagnostic Accuracy Depend on Radiologists' Experience?”. Journal of Women's Health. 1998;7(4):443–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical