Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 Fall;27(3):174-81.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.27.3.174.

How competent are we to assess psychotherapeutic competence in psychiatric residents?

Affiliations
Review

How competent are we to assess psychotherapeutic competence in psychiatric residents?

Joel Yager et al. Acad Psychiatry. 2003 Fall.

Abstract

Background: The Residency Review Committee (RRC) for Psychiatry has mandated that training programs "must demonstrate that residents have achieved competency in at least the following forms of treatment: brief therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, combined psychotherapy and psychopharmacology, psychodynamic therapy, and supportive therapy."

Aim: To analyze the extent to which programs can realistically demonstrate that residents have achieved summative competency in these modalities.

Method: We briefly review methods from other fields for assuring procedural competence, review methods available to psychiatric educators for assuring competencies in psychotherapy, and assess these methods for their adequacy.

Results: Available and foreseeable assessment methods are incapable of demonstrating that residents achieve summative competency in the five specified psychotherapies or of definitively distinguishing potentially dangerous practitioners from safe practitioners. At best, educators may be able to assure formative competencies, including mastery of core knowledge of the psychotherapies, actual undertaking of these psychotherapies, and adequate performance in selected elements of these psychotherapies.

Conclusions: Since it is unrealistic to assume that training programs will ever be able to confirm summative competencies in these psychotherapies, we advise programs to define precisely the levels of formative competence they expect, and design curriculum and measures accordingly. Further, we urge the RRC to revise their requirements to address expectations more honestly, and to re-state the expected competencies more modestly. We believe that the RRC can expect programs to show that all residents can demonstrate knowledge about the evidence base, theories and rules of practice supporting at least the following forms of treatment: brief therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, combined psychotherapy and psychopharmacology, psychodynamic therapy, and supportive therapy. We also believe that programs might be asked to demonstrate by means of patient logs and other forms of documentation that all residents have at least conducted such types of psychotherapy under qualified supervision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Assessing psychotherapy competence.
    Mohl PC. Mohl PC. Acad Psychiatry. 2004 Fall;28(3):251-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.28.3.251. Acad Psychiatry. 2004. PMID: 15507563 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by