Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Nov;30(6):569-75.
doi: 10.1007/BF02446787.

Effect of radiographic landmark identification errors on the accuracy of three-dimensional reconstruction of the human spine

Affiliations

Effect of radiographic landmark identification errors on the accuracy of three-dimensional reconstruction of the human spine

B André et al. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1992 Nov.

Abstract

In three-dimensional reconstruction of the human spine obtained from stereo-radiographic set-ups (two radiographs or more), it is extremely difficult to identify exactly the same landmarks on all radiographs. The effect of these identification errors was investigated with simulations made on points of known three-dimensional co-ordinates and compared with three-dimensional reconstructions of real spines obtained with the direct linear transformation algorithm. Results showed that radiographic identification errors of up to 2 mm were common, causing reconstruction errors of up to 5 mm. These reconstruction errors may be noticed in the form of geometrical inaccuracies in the graphical representation of three-dimensional reconstructions of the spine. Successive displacements were then imposed on image point co-ordinates to minimise the identification error and increase the reconstruction accuracy. The improvement on the three-dimensional reconstruction results was negligible. Three-dimensional reconstructions obtained from three radiographs were also investigated. They showed slightly more accurate reconstructions than those obtained from two radiographs. However, the increase of X-ray exposure on the patient may not be worthwhile.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Radiology. 1983 May;147(2):369-72 - PubMed
    1. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1980 Sep;18(5):694-700 - PubMed
    1. Invest Radiol. 1976 May-Jun;11(3):202-9 - PubMed
    1. J Orthop Res. 1987;5(1):102-13 - PubMed
    1. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1985;212:1-45 - PubMed

Publication types