Reliability of measuring iliac crest level in the standing and sitting position using a new measurement device
- PMID: 12975630
- DOI: 10.1016/S0161-4754(03)00097-6
Reliability of measuring iliac crest level in the standing and sitting position using a new measurement device
Abstract
Background: To date, the reliability studies of iliac crest (IC) level used nominal scales and presented conflicting results. To perform the IC level measurement, we propose the use of a measurement device that is composed of an inclinometer mounted on a crest level tester that measures IC level in degrees.
Objectives: To determine the interrater reliability of measuring iliac crest level in the standing and sitting position using an experimental device and to assess the precision of the measurements taken with the experimental device.
Method: Forty individuals (mean age 40 +/- 12 years) referred to physical therapy for treatment of low back pain (LBP) participated in the study (16 male participants). Six examiners performed the measurements. Three of the 6 examiners performed the measurements on each individual. Each examiner independently performed the measurement of IC level in standing and in sitting using the measurement device.
Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients, [formula (1,1)] for measurement of IC level in standing and sitting, were 0.80 (95% CI = 0.7-0.9) and 0.73 (95% CI = 0.6-0.8), respectively. Standard errors of measurement for IC level in standing and sitting were 0.91 and 0.86 degrees, respectively.
Conclusion: The use of a measurement device resulted in good reliability of IC level measurement in degrees in standing and moderate reliability of IC level in sitting position. This finding is relevant to plan future studies that will investigate if changes in IC level may be associated with outcomes of pain and function in patients with low back or pelvic dysfunctions.
Similar articles
-
Immediate improvements in side-to-side weight bearing and iliac crest symmetry after manipulation in patients with low back pain.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Jun;27(5):306-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.04.004. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004. PMID: 15195038 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of pelvic asymmetry and low back pain on trunk kinematics during sitting: a comparison with standing.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 1;31(5):E135-43. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201325.89493.5f. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006. PMID: 16508537
-
Inter- and intrarater reliability of a back range of motion instrument.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Dec;86(12):2347-53. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.304. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005. PMID: 16344034 Clinical Trial.
-
[Interrater studies of evaluating the reliability of somatic findings].Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1996 Aug;35(3):150-60. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1996. PMID: 8975344 Review. German.
-
[Injuries from sitting--disorders of posture].Med Monatsschr. 1966 May;20(5):200-3. Med Monatsschr. 1966. PMID: 4862657 Review. German. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Review of methods used by chiropractors to determine the site for applying manipulation.Chiropr Man Therap. 2013 Oct 21;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-36. Chiropr Man Therap. 2013. PMID: 24499598 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous