Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1992 Dec;41(10):581-5.

[Evaluation of the risk of arrhythmia after infarction]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 1300921
Review

[Evaluation of the risk of arrhythmia after infarction]

[Article in French]
J Y Le Heuzey. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1992 Dec.

Abstract

Evaluation of the risk of arrhythmias after myocardial infarction involves identification of those patients at a high risk of arrhythmic events, i.e. those who fall victim to ventricular tachycardia or sudden death. Such identification is an essential first stage before any treatment can be proposed. It has been clearly shown that the existence of premature ventricular contractions following infarction is an indicator of poor prognosis. In addition to evaluation of premature ventricular contractions, a Holter record can identify sinus variability, a parameter which the prognostic importance is currently being increasingly emphasized. Electrocardiography with averaging and high amplification has now been shown to be of value in the evaluation of arrhythmic risk after infarction. The negative predictive value of this investigation is very high, of the order of 90 percent. In addition to Holter and electrocardiography with averaging, two other non-invasive investigations can be used to determine arrhythmic risks after infarction. Stress testing can seek the presence of premature ventricular contractions related to exercise, while isotope ventriculography measures the value of ejection fraction which, in itself, has a high predictive value in terms of arrhythmic events. Mortality after infarction is proportional to the lowering of ejection fraction and among deaths approximately half are probably due to arrhythmias. Programmed ventricular pacing also has a role to play in evaluation of arrhythmic risk after infarction, but should not be routine. It may be indicated in those patients showing all of the signs of risk, i.e. repetitious forms by Holter, late potentials and low ejection fraction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources