[Why and how to grade renal carcinomas?]
- PMID: 1304108
[Why and how to grade renal carcinomas?]
Abstract
The prognosis of renal cell carcinomas has been a controversial subject for pathologists for a long time. At the present time, in addition to stage, the nuclear grade defined by Führman represents an essential element in the prognostic assessment. A renal cell carcinoma can be easily characterized by its stage and its grade, defining a precise prognosis. Specific entities such as tubulopapillary tumors, oncocytomas and chromophobe cell carcinomas must also be graded until the results of complementary studies become available allowing a better assessment of their autonomy among renal cell carcinomas.
Similar articles
-
Histopathology and classification of renal cell tumors (adenomas, oncocytomas and carcinomas). The basic cytological and histopathological elements and their use for diagnostics.Pathol Res Pract. 1986 May;181(2):125-43. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(86)80001-2. Pathol Res Pract. 1986. PMID: 3737468
-
[Non clear cell renal cell carcinoma. 2008 update in renal tumor pathology].Ann Pathol. 2008 Oct;28(5):381-401. doi: 10.1016/j.annpat.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Oct 17. Ann Pathol. 2008. PMID: 19068393 Review. French.
-
Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 Jun;31(6):957-60. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000249446.28713.53. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007. PMID: 17527087
-
Expression analysis of kidney-specific cadherin in a wide spectrum of traditional and newly recognized renal epithelial neoplasms: diagnostic and histogenetic implications.Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 Oct;31(10):1528-33. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318058818c. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007. PMID: 17895753
-
[Carcinoma and oncocytoma of the kidney. Phenotypic characteristics and prognostic features].Veroff Pathol. 1993;140:1-165. Veroff Pathol. 1993. PMID: 8434485 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical