Comparison of two carboplatin-containing regimens with standard chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer in a randomised phase II study. The EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative group
- PMID: 1314632
- DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90394-h
Comparison of two carboplatin-containing regimens with standard chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer in a randomised phase II study. The EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative group
Abstract
The EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative group performed a randomised phase II study in patients with small cell lung cancer comparing the standard cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/etoposide (CDE) regimen with two regimens containing the new and active cisplatin derivative, carboplatin, 400 mg/m2 in combination with ifosfamide, a drug without important myelotoxicity, at a dose of 5 g/m2 (IMP) or the non-myelotoxic drug vincristine twice 2 mg (VP). Of 178 evaluable patients, 63 received CDE [30 limited disease (LD), 33 extensive disease (ED)], 55 received IMP (22 LD, 33 ED) and 60 (26 LD, 34 ED) were treated with VP. The response duration was not statistically different: CDE 31 weeks, IMP 29 weeks and VP 21 weeks. The time to progression after CEE was 28 weeks, IMP 24 weeks and VP 17 weeks. This was significantly shorter after VP than after CDE (P = 0.017). The 60% response rate of the VP combination was low compared with CDE (83%) and IMP (77%). Toxicity of all three regimens was acceptable, and dose reduction for myelosuppression was necessary in only a minority of the patients. We conclude from this study that the combination of carboplatin, at the maximally tolerated dose of 400 mg/m2, in combination with ifosfamide 5 g/m2, is an active regimen with efficacy comparable with the standard CDE regimen.
Similar articles
-
Experience of a German multicenter study group with ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer.Semin Oncol. 1989 Feb;16(1 Suppl 3):9-18. Semin Oncol. 1989. PMID: 2539648 Clinical Trial.
-
Testing the possible non-cross resistance of two equipotent combination chemotherapy regimens against small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(2):204-7. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90176-g. Eur J Cancer. 1993. PMID: 8380697 Clinical Trial.
-
Standard- and high-dose etoposide, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and epirubicin in 100 patients with small-cell lung cancer: a mature follow-up report.Ann Oncol. 1999 May;10(5):561-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1026453922931. Ann Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10416006 Clinical Trial.
-
The place of ifosfamide in chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience and a selected literature update.Semin Oncol. 1995 Feb;22(1 Suppl 2):23-7. Semin Oncol. 1995. PMID: 7846538 Review.
-
[Chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1988 Apr;15(4 Pt 2-1):966-72. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1988. PMID: 2839116 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 2;2015(8):CD006849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006849.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26233609 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical pharmacokinetics and dose optimisation of carboplatin.Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Sep;33(3):161-83. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733030-00002. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997. PMID: 9314610 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials