Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Jan;26(1):71-5.

A criterion based audit of inpatient asthma care. Closing the feedback loop

Affiliations

A criterion based audit of inpatient asthma care. Closing the feedback loop

K L Lim et al. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1992 Jan.

Abstract

We have assessed the care of patients admitted to a specialist respiratory medical ward acutely ill with asthma, using a criterion based audit derived from a standard management protocol already in use in our hospitals. The audit was first performed from 01.01.90 to 31.08.90; after implementing certain changes, the audit was repeated from 1.12.90 to 31.1.91. Special attention was paid in each audit review to pre-admission measures, inpatient management and pre-discharge and follow-up management. During both audit periods, of a total of 78 patients, 74 patients gave a reason for the worsening of their asthma; 59 had had PEF measured and 58 had received systemic steroids before admission; 77 patients had full objective assessment of severity on admission; 76 patients were discharged on oral steroids; 62 had PEF meters for home monitoring; and 65 of the 68 patients who lived in our district were seen again within six weeks as outpatients in the chest clinic. However, only 30/55 (54%) had PEF variability of 20% or less (our criterion for appropriateness of discharge, in the first audit period) and only 32/55 had a written check on their inhaler technique in the first audit period. By relaxing our PEF criterion for discharge (in line with national guidelines), by introducing a stamp for recording that inhaler technique had been checked, and with encouragement and exhortation from senior staff, we improved our performance of meeting the set standards to 17 of 23 (74%) patients for PEF variability and to 22 of 23 (96%) patients for written check on inhaler technique in the second audit period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. BMJ. 1991 Jun 15;302(6790):1440-3 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1990 Oct 6;301(6755):797-800 - PubMed
    1. Thorax. 1990 Feb;45(2):130-4 - PubMed
    1. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1990 Apr;24(2):112-4 - PubMed
    1. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Jun;39(323):239-43 - PubMed