Platinum/etoposide therapy in non-small cell lung cancer
- PMID: 1323811
- DOI: 10.1159/000227110
Platinum/etoposide therapy in non-small cell lung cancer
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major health problem in the United States and in many other parts of the world. Identification of systemic therapy that can maintain or improve quality of life and prolong survival is essential because locally advanced disease or distant metastasis is found in the majority of these patients. A variety of combination regimens have produced response rates of 20% or greater in stage IV NSCLC patients in cooperative group trials, including studies conducted within the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Although no regimen has emerged as clearly superior, the highest 1-year survival rate (25%) in ECOG trials was observed in EP(etoposide/cisplatin)-treated patients. Subsequently, a randomized trial in which EP was compared to etoposide/carboplatin revealed no significant differences in survival or response rate, and toxicity was slightly less with etoposide/carboplatin. Results from recent phase II trials in which stage III NSCLC patients received preoperative EP and concurrent thoracic irradiation have shown response rates of 65-85%, as well as acceptable toxicity and surgical morbidity and mortality. Future stage IV NSCLC trials should include studies of platinum/etoposide plus new agents. Also a study comparing platinum/etoposide versus supportive care should be considered. The objectives of this study would be to compare survival, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness ratio. The results of recent phase II studies in stage III NSCLC patients suggest that preoperative cisplatin/etoposide and concurrent thoracic irradiation should be considered for evaluation in a phase III trial in stage IIIa NSCLC patients and that this regimen should also be evaluated in stage IIIb patients.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide with cisplatin: results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial.J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(3):623-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.3.623. J Clin Oncol. 2000. PMID: 10653877 Clinical Trial.
-
Quality of Life Achieved by Carboplatin Plus Etoposide as Third-Line Chemotherapy Compared with Best Supportive Care in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIB/IV.J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Feb;99 Suppl 2:S175-81. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016. PMID: 27266233
-
Evaluation of cisplatin, carboplatin, and etoposide in metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. A phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group.Cancer. 1996 Sep 1;78(5):998-1003. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960901)78:5<998::AID-CNCR9>3.0.CO;2-8. Cancer. 1996. PMID: 8780537 Clinical Trial.
-
[Treatment of the unresectable non small cell lung carcinoma].Cas Lek Cesk. 2005;144(9):602-12; discussion 612-3. Cas Lek Cesk. 2005. PMID: 16193938 Review. Czech.
-
Clinical issues in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer and the role of platinum-based therapy.Clin Lung Cancer. 2004 Mar;5(5):274-89. doi: 10.3816/CLC.2004.n.007. Clin Lung Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15086966 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical