Selection of a maximal test protocol to validate the Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test
- PMID: 1324103
Selection of a maximal test protocol to validate the Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to select a maximal aerobic power test protocol with which to validate a submaximal step test prediction equation. Subjects (N = 129), males and females 15 to 69 years of age, performed one maximal step test and one maximal treadmill test. The maximal treadmill protocol yielded higher peak VO2, ventilation, heart rate, and RER values. An age-predicted maximum heart rate was achieved by 35% of subjects on the step test and 55% on the treadmill. An RER of 1.15 was attained by 22% of the subjects on the step test and 53% on the treadmill. Regression analysis indicated that the submaximal test was more predictive of VO2max when the maximum was attained using the treadmill rather than the maximal step protocol. Peak VO2 values obtained from subjects tested on the treadmill will be used to develop a new prediction equation for the Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test.
Comment in
-
A gold standard for submaximal aerobic tests.Can J Sport Sci. 1992 Jun;17(2):154. Can J Sport Sci. 1992. PMID: 1324114 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Blood lactate response to the Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test in females.Can J Sport Sci. 1992 Jun;17(2):148-51. Can J Sport Sci. 1992. PMID: 1324110
-
Development of a submaximal treadmill jogging test for fit college-aged individuals.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 May;25(5):643-7. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993. PMID: 8492693
-
A comparison between predicted VO2 max from the Astrand procedure and the Canadian Home Fitness Test.Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1979 Sep;4(3):214-8. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1979. PMID: 540416
-
Assessment and interpretation of aerobic fitness in children and adolescents.Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1994;22:435-76. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1994. PMID: 7925551 Review.
-
How Accurate Is the Prediction of Maximal Oxygen Uptake with Treadmill Testing?PLoS One. 2016 Nov 22;11(11):e0166608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166608. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27875547 Free PMC article. Review.