Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Oct;107(2):559-65.
doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb12783.x.

Effects of propofol and enflurane on action potentials, membrane currents and contraction of guinea-pig isolated ventricular myocytes

Affiliations

Effects of propofol and enflurane on action potentials, membrane currents and contraction of guinea-pig isolated ventricular myocytes

R M Puttick et al. Br J Pharmacol. 1992 Oct.

Abstract

1. The effects of two general anaesthetics, propofol and enflurane, on electrical activity and contractions were investigated in single myocytes isolated from guinea-pig ventricles. 2. Propofol and enflurane depressed the plateau and shortened the duration of action potentials. 3. Under voltage-clamp conditions, propofol and enflurane reduced the amplitude of inward calcium current and of additional inward current activated by cytosolic calcium. 4. Contractions (measured with an optical technique) accompanying either action potentials or second inward currents (in response to depolarizations to 0 mV) were reduced by both anaesthetics. The mechanisms for calcium entry during contractions accompanying pulses to positive potentials such as +60 mV are thought to differ from those accompanying second inward currents which are evoked by pulses from -40 to 0 mV. Enflurane enhanced the amplitudes of contractions accompanying pulses to positive potentials; in contrast these contractions were depressed by propofol. 5. In experiments where recovery processes were investigated by use of pairs of voltage-clamp pulses with a variable interval between them, enflurane but not propofol slowed the recovery of contractions and calcium-activated 'tail' currents. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that enflurane may impair calcium handling by the sarcoplasmic reticulum whereas propofol has little, if any, effect at this site. 6. In conclusion, the actions of propofol and enflurane on second inward currents contribute to their effects on action potentials and contraction. The negative inotropic effect of both anaesthetics may result partly from reduced calcium influx to trigger contraction, and for enflurane, partly from an impairment of calcium handling by the sarcoplasmic reticulum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anesthesiology. 1990 May;72(5):911-20 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1985 Aug 1-7;316(6027):443-6 - PubMed
    1. Circ Res. 1987 Jul;61(1):148-54 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1979 Mar;236(3):C103-10 - PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Physiol. 1979;41:413-24 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources