Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1976 Jul 27;33(2):89-102.
doi: 10.1007/BF00281882.

On the origin of the supernumerary chromosome in autosomal trisomies--with special reference to Down's syndrome. A bias in tracing nondisjunction by chromosomal and biochemical polymorphisms

On the origin of the supernumerary chromosome in autosomal trisomies--with special reference to Down's syndrome. A bias in tracing nondisjunction by chromosomal and biochemical polymorphisms

U Langenbeck et al. Hum Genet. .

Abstract

The differential staining methods for chromosomes have led to the demonstration of more chromosomal polymorphisms. Not rarely, these polymorphisms allow in autosomal trisomies the detection of parental origin of the supernumerary chromosome. In addition, the malsegregation may be ascribed to 1st or 2nd meiotic division in informative families. This approach of analyzing possible causes of trisomies is subject to a considerable bias. Trisomic phenotypes are twice as frequent for 2nd meiotic errors than for 1st meiotic errors. Also, rare chromosome variants seldom occur in matings where malsegregation in 1st meiotic division can be detected. In the present paper this bias is analyzed mathematically on the family as well as on the population level. From this mathematical analysis and from the data in the literature we conclude that Down's syndrome as a whole is caused about 5-10 times more often by a malsegregation in 1st meiotic than by an error in 2nd meiotic division. Mainly from experimental studies in rodents, causes for errors in 1st and 2nd meiotic division are becoming apparent. They are summarized in the context of the results of the present paper.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Genet (Zur). 1973;46(2):65-98 - PubMed
    1. Humangenetik. 1973;20(2):89-101 - PubMed
    1. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1975;14(3-6):237-40 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1962 Jan 6;1(7219):8-10 - PubMed
    1. Clin Genet. 1974;6(4):247-57 - PubMed