Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Nov 6;595(1):32-8.
doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)91449-o.

Antinociception produced by receptor selective opioids: modulation of spinal antinociceptive effects by supraspinal opioids

Affiliations

Antinociception produced by receptor selective opioids: modulation of spinal antinociceptive effects by supraspinal opioids

C Miaskowski et al. Brain Res. .

Abstract

The effect of intracerebroventricular administration of low-antinociceptive doses of selective mu- (DAMGO) or delta- (DPDPE) opioid agonists on the dose-dependent antinociceptive effects produced by intrathecal administration of sequentially increasing doses of selective mu-, delta-, or kappa-(U50,488H) opioid agonists was evaluated, in the rat, using the Randall-Selitto paw-withdrawal test. When DPDPE or U50,488H was administered intrathecally, the low doses of both intracerebroventricular DAMGO and intracerebroventricular DPDPE markedly enhanced the antinociceptive effects of both intrathecal opioids. In contrast, when DAMGO was administered intrathecally, both intracerebroventricular DAMGO and intracerebroventricular DPDPE, administered in low doses, markedly antagonized the antinociceptive effects of the intrathecal opioid. In addition, the intracerebroventricular administration of a low-antinociceptive dose of a second mu-opioid agonist, morphiceptin, antagonized the antinociceptive effects of intrathecal morphiceptin. The antagonism of the antinociceptive effects observed with spinal administration of DAMGO is dose-dependent, with the effect observed only at low doses. Furthermore, the antagonism cannot be explained by a reduction in motor deficits produced by intrathecal administration of DAMGO, because there were no differences in motor deficits, measured with an accelerating Rotarod treadmill, between intrathecal DAMGO administered as a single agent or as part of a combination regimen. The differences in antinociceptive effects obtained with the various supraspinal and spinal combinations are discussed in terms of the interactions that may occur between brainstem and spinal opioid receptor sites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources