Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Dec;90(6):2491-5.
doi: 10.1172/JCI116141.

Immunopotentiating reconstituted influenza virus virosome vaccine delivery system for immunization against hepatitis A

Affiliations

Immunopotentiating reconstituted influenza virus virosome vaccine delivery system for immunization against hepatitis A

R Glück et al. J Clin Invest. 1992 Dec.

Abstract

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) was purified from MRC-5 human diploid cell cultures, inactivated with formalin, and evaluated for safety and immunogenicity in humans. Three vaccine formulations were produced: (a) a fluid preparation containing inactivated HAV, (b) inactivated HAV adsorbed to Al(OH)3, and (c) inactivated HAV coupled to novel immunopotentiating reconstituted influenza virosomes (IRIV). IRIV were prepared by combining phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phospholipids originating from the influenza virus envelope, influenza virus hemagglutinin, and neuraminidase. The HAV-IRIV appeared as unilamellar vesicles with a diameter of approximately 150 nm when viewed by transmission electron microscopy. Upon intramuscular injection, the alum-adsorbed vaccine was associated with significantly (P < 0.01) more local adverse reactions than either the fluid or IRIV formulations. 14 d after a single dose of vaccine, all the recipients of the IRIV formulation seroconverted (> or = 20 mIU/ml) versus 30 and 44% for those who received the fluid and alum-adsorbed vaccines, respectively (P < 0.001). The geometric mean anti-HAV antibody titer achieved after immunization with the IRIV-HAV vaccine was also significantly higher (P < 0.005) compared with the other two vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vaccine. 1990 Dec;8(6):581-4 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Med. 1990 Dec 1;172(6):1643-51 - PubMed
    1. J Immunol. 1991 Jun 1;146(11):3697-702 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1986 Dec 12;234(4782):1349-56 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1988 May 6;240(4853):800-2 - PubMed