Comparison of casual, ambulatory and self-measured blood pressure in a study of nitrendipine vs bisoprolol
- PMID: 1352496
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00265917
Comparison of casual, ambulatory and self-measured blood pressure in a study of nitrendipine vs bisoprolol
Abstract
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a single morning dose of either 10 mg bisoprolol (n = 26) or 20 mg nitrendipine (n = 27) were investigated. Blood pressure was measured by three techniques: (1) Casual blood pressure 24 h after the dose; (2) ambulatory 24-h whole-day monitoring; and (3) self-recorded blood pressure in the morning 24 h after the dose (6-8 a.m.) and in the evening (6-8 p.m.). After 4 weeks of therapy bisoprolol had produced a highly significant reduction in blood pressure as assessed by causal, ambulatory day- and night-time monitoring, and self-measured morning and evening readings. Bisoprolol was significantly more effective than nitrendipine, which did not induce a significant reduction in the ambulatory night-time recordings. Whole-day ambulatory blood pressure profiles showed an antihypertensive effect of bisoprolol throughout the entire 24-h period. 24-h blood pressure curves after nitrendipine demonstrated a markedly shorter duration of action, with no reduction in early morning blood pressure. Adverse effects and tolerability of the two drugs were comparable. The average changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure after bisoprolol and nitrendipine in 2-h periods of ambulatory monitoring (6-8 a.m. and 6-8 p.m.) and self-measured blood pressure (6-8 a.m. and 6-8 p.m.) showed a good agreement between ambulatory and self-measured blood pressure determinations with no significant difference between the methods. The results show that 24 h antihypertensive efficacy was more pronounced for bisoprolol than for nitrendipine at the doses studied.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
An evaluation of self-measured blood pressure in a study with a calcium-channel antagonist versus a beta-blocker.Am J Hypertens. 1992 Mar;5(3):154-60. doi: 10.1093/ajh/5.3.154. Am J Hypertens. 1992. PMID: 1349485 Clinical Trial.
-
Casual versus ambulatory twenty-four-hour blood pressure measurement in a comparative study with bisoprolol or nitrendipine.J Hypertens Suppl. 1990 Sep;8(4):S91-4. J Hypertens Suppl. 1990. PMID: 1979615 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative effects of bisoprolol and nitrendipine on exercise capacity in hypertensive patients with regular physical activity.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2000 Jan;35(1):78-83. doi: 10.1097/00005344-200001000-00010. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2000. PMID: 10630736 Clinical Trial.
-
Blood-pressure-lowering effect of carvedilol vs nitrendipine in geriatric hypertensives.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;38 Suppl 2:S167-70. doi: 10.1007/BF01409490. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990. PMID: 1974510 Clinical Trial.
-
Ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure versus self-measured blood pressure in pharmacologic trials.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;24 Suppl 2:S20-5. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994. PMID: 7898091 Review.
Cited by
-
CLOCK-BMAL1 regulates circadian oscillation of ventricular arrhythmias in failing hearts through β1 adrenergic receptor.Am J Transl Res. 2020 Oct 15;12(10):6122-6135. eCollection 2020. Am J Transl Res. 2020. PMID: 33194018 Free PMC article.
-
Therapeutic applications of circadian rhythms for the cardiovascular system.Front Pharmacol. 2015 Apr 17;6:77. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00077. eCollection 2015. Front Pharmacol. 2015. PMID: 25941487 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In Silico comparison between metoprolol succinate and bisoprolol on 24-hour systolic blood pressures.Drugs R D. 2014 Dec;14(4):325-32. doi: 10.1007/s40268-014-0073-5. Drugs R D. 2014. PMID: 25488798 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical