Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Dec;138(12):2629-37.
doi: 10.1099/00221287-138-12-2629.

Distinct genetic groups of Giardia intestinalis distinguished by restriction fragment length polymorphisms

Affiliations

Distinct genetic groups of Giardia intestinalis distinguished by restriction fragment length polymorphisms

P L Ey et al. J Gen Microbiol. 1992 Dec.

Abstract

The taxonomic status of the parasitic protozoal species Giardia intestinalis depends on the morphological similarity of all Giardia isolated from humans and the presumption that Giardia are host-specific. On the basis of electrophoretic data derived from examination of 26 enzyme loci in Australian isolates, it has been proposed that G. intestinalis is a species complex comprising three or four genetically distinct (but morphologically cryptic) species. These received the tentative designations of genetic groups I-IV (R. H. Andrews, M. Adams, P. F. L. Boreham, G. Mayrhofer & B. P. Meloni. International Journal for Parasitology 19, 183-190, 1989). In the present study, two unrelated DNA probes (one specific for a gene encoding a trophozoite surface protein, the other detecting a non-coding repetitive sequence within the G. intestinalis genome) were used in Southern hybridization analyses to examine 10 axenic isolates of G. intestinalis, established from diverse geographical regions in Australia, together with the Portland-1 isolate from the USA. Both probes identified every isolate unambiguously as belonging to one or other of two genetic clusters. Electrophoretic analysis of the same samples indicated that these clusters correspond to the previously defined genetic groups I and II. No heterogeneity was apparent within the seven group I isolates using either probe. However, when probed with the repetitive sequence, the four isolates belonging to group II exhibited small differences in banding patterns, suggesting that this group may be less homogeneous than group I.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types