Comparison of three different systems of vectorcardiography

H C BURGER et al. Am Heart J. 1959 May.

. 1959 May;57(5):723-9.

doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(59)90181-4.

No abstract available

Similar articles

Comparison of the cube and tetrahedral lead systems for vectorcardiography.
THULESIUS O, ASTROM L. THULESIUS O, et al. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1962;14:235-40. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1962. PMID: 13921089 No abstract available.
Comparison of four orthogonal systems of vectorcardiography.
LANGNER PH Jr, OKADA RH, MOORE SR, FIES HL. LANGNER PH Jr, et al. Circulation. 1958 Jan;17(1):46-54. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.17.1.46. Circulation. 1958. PMID: 13511621 No abstract available.
Comparison of two systems of vectorcardiography with an electrode to the frontal and dorsal sides of the trunk, respectively.
BURGER HC, VAN MILAAN JB, KLIP W. BURGER HC, et al. Am Heart J. 1956 Jan;51(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(56)90173-9. Am Heart J. 1956. PMID: 13268308 No abstract available.
A study of spatial vectorcardiography: a comparison of three lead systems for representing the electrical forces of the heart in three dimensions.
GENECIN A, MILNOR WR, TALBOT SA, NEWMAN EV. GENECIN A, et al. J Clin Invest. 1950 Jun;29(6):815. J Clin Invest. 1950. PMID: 15436734 No abstract available.
Vectorcardiography: a tool for non-invasive detection of reperfusion and reocclusion?
Eriksson SV. Eriksson SV. Thromb Haemost. 1999 Sep;82 Suppl 1:64-7. Thromb Haemost. 1999. PMID: 10695489 Review.

Orthogonal electrocardiogram derived from the limb and chest electrodes of the conventional 12-lead system.
Levkov CL. Levkov CL. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1987 Mar;25(2):155-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02442844. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1987. PMID: 3695618 No abstract available.
[The variability of the QRS loop in the orthogonal lead system of frank and schmitt (SVEC III) (author's transl)].
Hiltmann WD. Hiltmann WD. Basic Res Cardiol. 1975 Jan-Feb;70(1):87-102. doi: 10.1007/BF01905556. Basic Res Cardiol. 1975. PMID: 1122221 German.