Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Sep;14(3):205-15.

ABRF-PRG03: phosphorylation site determination

Affiliations

ABRF-PRG03: phosphorylation site determination

David Arnott et al. J Biomol Tech. 2003 Sep.

Abstract

A fundamental aspect of proteomics is the analysis of post-translational modifications, of which phosphorylation is an important class. Numerous nonradioactivity-based methods have been described for high-sensitivity phosphorylation site mapping. The ABRF Proteomics Research Group has conducted a study to help determine how many laboratories are equipped to take on such projects, which methods they choose to apply, and how successful the laboratories are in implementing particular methodologies. The ABRF-PRG03 sample was distributed as a tryptic digest of a mixture of two proteins with two synthetic phosphopeptides added. Each sample contained 5 pmol of unphosphorylated protein digest, 1 pmol of each phosphopeptide from the same protein, and 200 fmol of a minor protein component. Study participants were challenged to identify the two proteins and the two phosphorylated peptides, and determine the site of phosphorylation in each peptide. Almost all respondents successfully identified the major protein component, whereas only 10% identified the minor protein component. Phosphorylation site analysis proved surprisingly difficult, with only 3 of the 54 laboratories correctly determining both sites of phosphorylation. Various strategies and instruments were applied to this task with mixed success; chromatographic separation of the peptides was clearly helpful, whereas enrichment by metal affinity chromatography met with surprisingly little success. We conclude that locating sites of phosphorylation remains a significant challenge at this level of sample abundance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Mass spectrometric characterization of the test sample. A: MALDI-TOF analysis of 10% of the unfractionated mixture. Peaks corresponding to PDI (*) and BSA (x) are labeled. Regions containing the phosphopeptides are shown in the insets. B: Ion trap MS/MS of phosphopeptide P1, products of [M+2H]2+ = 482.7. The sequence and predicted b and y series fragments are listed; underlined masses were observed in the spectrum. C: MS/MS of phosphopeptide P2, [M+2H]2+ = 1013.9, labeled as in B.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Success rates for mass spectrometric approaches to protein identification. Five MALDI-TOF as well as all LC-MS and static nanospray analyses used MS/MS.

References

    1. Wetternhall RE, Aebersold RH, Hood LE. Solid-phase sequencing of 32P-labeled phosphopeptides at picomole and subpicomole levels. Methods Enzymol 1991; 201:186–199. - PubMed
    1. Posewitz M, Tempst P. Immobilized gallium (II) affinity chromatography of phosphopeptides. Anal Chem 1999;71:2883–2892. - PubMed
    1. Ficarro S, McCleland M, Stukenberg P, et al. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature Biotechnol 2002;20:301–305. - PubMed
    1. Köcher, T, Allmaier, G, Matthias Wilm, M. Nanoelectrospray-based detection and sequencing of substoichiometric amounts of phosphopeptides in complex mixtures. J Mass Spectrom 2003;38:131–137. - PubMed
    1. Molloy MP, Andrews PC. Phosphopeptide derivatization signatures to identify serine and threonine phosphorylated peptides by mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2001;73:5387–5394. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources