Evaluation of the effectiveness of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correcting myopia.

Methods: Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two of authors independently. Summary odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by DerSimonian & Laird random-effects model and Mantel-Haenszel (fixed-effects) model. All calculations were based on an intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis.

Results: Five hundred and eighty eyes (476 patients) from 5 randomized controlled trials were included in this study. At > or = 6 months follow-up, by random-effects model, the pooled odds ratios (OR, for LASIK vs. PRK) of postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better for all trials were 1.31 (95% CI=0.77-2.22) by per protocol analysis and 1.18 (95% CI=0.74-1.88) by intention-to-treat analysis. In the refractive outcome, the pooled OR of the postoperative spherical equivalent refraction within +/-0.5 diopter (D) of emmetropia did not show any statistical significance, for which the OR were 0.75 (95% CI=0.48-1.18) by per protocol analysis and 0.70 (95% CI=0.47-1.04) by intention-to-treat analysis.

Conclusions: LASIK and PRK were found to be similarly effective for the correction of myopia from -1.5 to -15.0 D in a greater than 6 month follow-up.