Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Sep 18:4:11.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-4-11. Print 2003 Sep 18.

SMART: self-management of anticoagulation, a randomised trial [ISRCTN19313375]

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

SMART: self-management of anticoagulation, a randomised trial [ISRCTN19313375]

Deborah McCahon et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Oral anticoagulation monitoring has traditionally taken place in secondary care because of the need for a laboratory blood test, the international normalised ratio (INR). The development of reliable near patient testing (NPT) systems for INR estimation has facilitated devolution of testing to primary care. Patient self-management is a logical progression from the primary care model. This study will be the first to randomise non-selected patients in primary care, to either self-management or standard care.

Method: The study was a multi-centred randomised controlled trial with patients from 49 general practices recruited. Those suitable for inclusion were aged 18 or over, with a long term indication for oral anticoagulation, who had taken warfarin for at least six months. Patients randomised to the intervention arm attended at least two training sessions which were practice-based, 1 week apart. Each patient was assessed on their capability to undertake self management. If considered capable, they were given a near patient INR testing monitor, test strips and quality control material for home testing. Patients managed their own anticoagulation for a period of 12 months and performed their INR test every 2 weeks. Control patients continued with their pre-study care either attending hospital or practice based anticoagulant clinics.

Discussion: The methodology used in this trial will overcome concerns from previous trials of selection bias and relevance to the UK health service. The study will give a clearer understanding of the benefits of self-management in terms of clinical and cost effectiveness and patient preference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of study design

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Taylor F, Ramsay M, Covell B, Gaminara L, Thompson D, Cohen H, et al. Management of expanding anticoagulation clinics: a role for general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45:153–158. - PubMed
    1. Sudlow CM, Rodgers H, Kenny RA, Thomson RG. Service provision and use of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 1995;311:558–561. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR, Wintzen AR, van der Meer FJM, Vandenbrouke JP, Briet E. Optimal anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:11–17. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199507063330103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fitzmaurice DA, Hobbs FDR, Murray JA. Monitoring oral anticoagulation in primary care. British Medical Journal. 1996;312:1431–1432. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fitzmaurice DA, Hobbs FDR, Murray ET, Bradley CP, Holder R. Evaluation of computerised decision support for oral anticoagulation management in primary care. BJGP. 1996;46:533–535. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data