Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Oct;37(10):1600-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF01296508.

Effect of luminal acidification on guinea pig gastric mucosa

Affiliations

Effect of luminal acidification on guinea pig gastric mucosa

R Visvanathan. Dig Dis Sci. 1992 Oct.

Abstract

H+ secretion was studied in guinea pig fundic mucosa incubated in (A) bicarbonate-Ringer's gassed with 95% O2-5% CO2, or (B) HEPES gassed with 100% O2 before and after luminal pH was lowered to 2.0 for periods up to 90 min. At pH 2.0 for 60 min, H+ secretion in group A tissues fell by 35 +/- 4% (P = 0.02) from a control rate of 1.35 +/- 0.09 mu eq/cm2/hr and in group B tissues by 50 +/- 11% (P = 0.01) from a control rate of 1.59 +/- 0.08 mu eq/cm2/hr. After 90 min at pH 2.0, H+ secretion in group A fell by 53 +/- 8% (P = 0.02) from a control rate of 1.47 +/- 0.07 mu eq/cm2/hr and in group B fell by 44 +/- 6% (P = 0.01) from a control rate of 1.38 +/- 0.07 mu eq/cm2/hr. Histamine 1 x 10(-4) M stimulation following exposure to pH 2.0 for 90 min increased secretion in group A tissues from 0.80 +/- 0.14 to 1.06 +/- 0.13 mu eq/cm2/hr (P < 0.05), compared with an increase in nonacidified controls from 1.15 +/- 0.22 to 1.80 +/- 0.20 mu eq/cm2/hr (P < 0.05) and in group B tissues from 1.27 +/- 0.10 to 1.56 +/- 0.19 mu eq/cm2/hr (P < 0.05) compared with nonacidified controls from 1.43 +/- 0.22 to 2.23 +/- 0.41 mu eq/cm2/hr (P < 0.05). Secretory function and electrical characteristics were adversely affected by luminal acidification to pH 2.0 and suggested a breach in the mucosal barrier with damage to parietal cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1979 Aug 16;301(7):364-9 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1985 Jan 3-9;313(5997):52-4 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1977 Jan;133(1):8-12 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1983 Feb;244(2):G171-82 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1980 Dec;239(6):G536-42 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources