The effect of magnetic resonance imagers on implanted neurostimulators
- PMID: 1371004
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb02904.x
The effect of magnetic resonance imagers on implanted neurostimulators
Abstract
This in-vitro study was designed to investigate the safety of various implanted neurostimulators in magnetic resonance (MR) imagers. The effects of the static and changing magnetic fields and the radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic field generated by 0.35 and 1.5 T MR imagers on the voltage output of four models of implantable passive neurostimulators and two models of implantable self-powered neurostimulators was studied. The neurostimulators were mounted on a support and placed in the imagers. An oscilloscope monitored the voltages at the outputs of the neurostimulators. For an Avery single-channel stimulator, located at the isocenter, the amplitude of the output pulses induced by the 0.35 T imager was 6V; from a 1.5 T imager, it was 12 V. These amplitudes can cause discomfort and possible harm to a patient if the typical therapeutic value is 1-5 V. The amplitude of the stimulator receiver's output decreased to relatively safe values beyond 40 cm from the isocenter. By contrast, there was no significant voltage output from the Medtronic SE-4 receiver. For two models of self-powered neurostimulators, the Medtronic Itrel and the Cordis MK II, the programmed stimulus parameters were not affected by the pulsed magnetic fields of the MR imagers. However, the RF fields at the isocenter heated the metal case of the stimulators. The rotational and linear forces produced by the fixed magnet on the Cordis MK II were judged to be too strong for a patient with this implant to be scanned. The study showed that patients with certain types of implanted neurostimulators can be scanned safely under certain conditions.
Similar articles
-
Magnetic resonance imaging with implanted neurostimulators: an in vitro and in vivo study.Neurosurgery. 1999 Jan;44(1):118-25; discussion 125-6. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199901000-00073. Neurosurgery. 1999. PMID: 9894972
-
Magnetic resonance imaging with implanted neurostimulators: numerical calculation of the induced heating.Biomed Tech (Berl). 2002;47 Suppl 1 Pt 2:660-3. doi: 10.1515/bmte.2002.47.s1b.660. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2002. PMID: 12465267
-
Analysis of induced electrical currents from magnetic field coupling inside implantable neurostimulator leads.Biomed Eng Online. 2011 Oct 21;10:94. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-94. Biomed Eng Online. 2011. PMID: 22014169 Free PMC article.
-
The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. MR imaging safety considerations. Radiological Society of North America.Radiographics. 1999 Nov-Dec;19(6):1641-51. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.19.6.g99no331641. Radiographics. 1999. PMID: 10555679 Review.
-
Safety considerations in MR imaging.Radiology. 1990 Sep;176(3):593-606. doi: 10.1148/radiology.176.3.2202008. Radiology. 1990. PMID: 2202008 Review.
Cited by
-
Improving Safety of MRI in Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):250-262. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192291. Epub 2020 Jun 23. Radiology. 2020. PMID: 32573388 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Three-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Deep Brain Stimulators: Results From a Phantom Study and a Pilot Study in Patients.Neurosurgery. 2021 Jan 13;88(2):349-355. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa439. Neurosurgery. 2021. PMID: 33045736 Free PMC article.
-
A Programmable Multi-biomarker Neural Sensor for Closed-loop DBS.IEEE Access. 2018;7:230-244. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2885336. Epub 2018 Dec 7. IEEE Access. 2018. PMID: 30976472 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-disease Deep Brain Stimulation.IEEE Access. 2020;8:216933-216947. doi: 10.1109/access.2020.3041942. Epub 2020 Dec 2. IEEE Access. 2020. PMID: 33381359 Free PMC article.
-
Temperature measurement on neurological pulse generators during MR scans.Biomed Eng Online. 2002 Sep 12;1:2. doi: 10.1186/1475-925x-1-2. Biomed Eng Online. 2002. PMID: 12437766 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical