Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Apr;22(4):943-9.
doi: 10.1002/eji.1830220410.

T cell epitope selection: dominance may be determined by both affinity for major histocompatibility complex and stoichiometry of epitope

Affiliations

T cell epitope selection: dominance may be determined by both affinity for major histocompatibility complex and stoichiometry of epitope

W F Li et al. Eur J Immunol. 1992 Apr.

Abstract

The majority of T cell hybridomas produced in the BALB/c mouse in response to immunization with lambda repressor cI recognize a peptide fragment comprising of residues 12 to 26 (P12-26). Some other parts of the cI (P1-14, P33-48 and P73-88) are defective in generating T cell responses in the BALB/c mouse. P73-88 may be converted into a T cell determinant if a few more amino acid residues are included (P67-88). Together with P46-67 and P80-102, most peptides derived from cI were capable of eliciting T cell responses by themselves in BALB/c mouse. The mechanisms underlying the selection of P12-26 over the other epitopes when lambda repressor was used as immunogen were examined. The dominant response to P12-26 was attenuated by tolerizing with intravenous administration of P12-26. Under such treatment the T cell response to P12-26 was reduced by 80% but there was no enhancement on the responses toward other epitopes. The selection of P12-26 is, thus, unlikely to be due to a competition at the T cell level. It was also found that the dominance of P12-26 was not simply due to a higher affinity of P12-26 for major histocompatibility complex molecules. For example P12-26 binds better to I-Ad molecule than P80-102, but co-injection with equimole of P12-26 only slightly inhibited P80-102-induced T cell response. Instead, it required a few molar excess of P12-26 to effectively block the association of P80-102 with I-Ad molecules and to inhibit the T cell immunity to P80-102. Since epitopes such as P46-67, P67-88 and P80-102 were generated from lambda repressor cI at a lower molar basis than that of P12-26, it is suggested that the dominance of P12-26 was probably generated by such stoichiometry difference, in addition to the higher affinity of P12-26 for I-Ad molecules.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources