The use of sedative agents in critically ill patients
- PMID: 1377117
- DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199243040-00007
The use of sedative agents in critically ill patients
Abstract
The main aim of sedation in the critically ill patient is to provide relief from anxiety and pain. The current, ideal level of sedation should leave a patient who is lightly asleep but easily roused. No single regimen is suitable for all patients. The level of sedation should be monitored, and the choice of agent, the dose and the route of administration adjusted appropriately. Midazolam is often used to provide sleep and anxiolysis. Alternatives include propofol and isoflurane. Propofol is easily titrated to achieve the desired level of sedation, and its effects rapidly end when the infusion is stopped. Isoflurane also appears promising, but special equipment is needed for its administration. Morphine is the standard analgesic agent. The principal metabolites, morphine-6-glucuronide, is also a potent opioid agonist and may accumulate in renal failure. Of the newer analgesic agents, alfentanil is an ideal agent for infusion, and may be the agent of choice in renal failure. Neuromuscular blocking agents are indicated only in specific circumstances, and used only once it is known patients are asleep and pain free. The actions of these agents are unpredictable in the critically ill patient. Alterations in drug effect and elimination may occur, especially in the patient with hepatic and renal failure. This may also apply to active metabolites of the parent drug. When planning sedation regimens, specific patient needs and staffing levels must be remembered. Attention to the environment is also important. Midazolam and morphine given by intermittent bolus or by infusion are the mainstay of most regimens. Propofol is ideal for short periods of care on the ICU, and during weaning when longer acting agents are being eliminated.
Similar articles
-
Optimal intravenous dosing strategies for sedatives and analgesics in the intensive care unit.Crit Care Clin. 1995 Oct;11(4):827-47. Crit Care Clin. 1995. PMID: 8535981 Review.
-
[Sedation and analgesia in intensive therapy].Med Pregl. 1998 Nov-Dec;51(11-12):509-17. Med Pregl. 1998. PMID: 10081271 Review. Croatian.
-
Analgosedation: a paradigm shift in intensive care unit sedation practice.Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Apr;46(4):530-40. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q525. Epub 2012 Apr 10. Ann Pharmacother. 2012. PMID: 22496477 Review.
-
Cost of ICU sedation: comparison of empirical and controlled sedation methods.Clin Intensive Care. 1994;5(5 Suppl):17-21. Clin Intensive Care. 1994. PMID: 10150550 Clinical Trial.
-
Postoperative analgesia and sedation in the adult intensive care unit: a guide to drug selection.Drugs. 2003;63(8):755-67. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363080-00003. Drugs. 2003. PMID: 12662124 Review.
Cited by
-
Sedation practice in the intensive care unit: a UK national survey.Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R152. doi: 10.1186/cc7141. Epub 2008 Dec 1. Crit Care. 2008. PMID: 19046459 Free PMC article.
-
Sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: how is it done in reality? Results of a patient-based survey of analgesia and sedation.Intensive Care Med. 2006 Aug;32(8):1137-42. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0214-6. Epub 2006 Jun 2. Intensive Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16741692
-
Propofol. An overview of its pharmacology and a review of its clinical efficacy in intensive care sedation.Drugs. 1995 Oct;50(4):636-57. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199550040-00006. Drugs. 1995. PMID: 8536552 Review.
-
Assessment of depth of midazolam sedation using objective parameters.Intensive Care Med. 1996 Dec;22(12):1385-90. doi: 10.1007/BF01709555. Intensive Care Med. 1996. PMID: 8986490
-
Bispectral index versus COMFORT score to determine the level of sedation in paediatric intensive care unit patients: a prospective study.Crit Care. 2005 Feb;9(1):R9-17. doi: 10.1186/cc2977. Epub 2004 Nov 10. Crit Care. 2005. PMID: 15693968 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical