Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: registration without learning?
- PMID: 1385608
- DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.4.667
Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: registration without learning?
Abstract
We investigated judgments of the frequency of test items (Y) that were highly similar to studied items (X) to test a prediction made by several memory models: that the judged frequency of Y should be proportional to the judged frequency of X. Whether stimuli were pictures or words, judged frequency of Y was bimodally distributed with 1 mode at zero, suggesting that frequency judgments involve a 2-stage process in which a zero judgment is made if there is a mismatch between retrieved information and the test item. Nonzero judgements, taken by themselves, were consistent with the prediction of proportionality. In 2 experiments, the percentage of zero judgments made to Y increased with repetition of X, but in 2 others the percentage did not change beyond frequency = 1. The percentage of "new" judgments in recognition memory followed this same pattern. Because the judged frequency of X increased even as X-Y discrimination showed no improvement, we characterize the result as "registration without learning."
Comment in
-
Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):319-31. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.319. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004. PMID: 14979807
Similar articles
-
When encoding fails: instructions, feedback, and registration without learning.Mem Cognit. 1995 Mar;23(2):213-26. doi: 10.3758/bf03197223. Mem Cognit. 1995. PMID: 7731366
-
Activating representations in permanent memory: different benefits for pictures and words.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Sep;23(5):1106-21. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.5.1106. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997. PMID: 9293624
-
Contribution of perceptual fluency to recognition judgments.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 Mar;17(2):210-23. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.17.2.210. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991. PMID: 1827829
-
Assessing same/different judgments in individuals with severe intellectual disabilities: a status report.Res Dev Disabil. 1997 Sep-Oct;18(5):343-68. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(97)00015-2. Res Dev Disabil. 1997. PMID: 9292929 Review.
-
A tutorial review on methods for collecting similarity judgments from human observers.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):737-751. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03044-3. Epub 2025 Mar 11. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025. PMID: 40069479 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of repetition and response deadline on associative recognition in young and older adults.Mem Cognit. 2004 Oct;32(7):1182-93. doi: 10.3758/bf03196891. Mem Cognit. 2004. PMID: 15813499
-
Individual differences in forced-choice recognition memory: partitioning contributions of recollection and familiarity.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(11):2189-206. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.910240. Epub 2014 May 6. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014. PMID: 24796268 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of repetition and response deadline on item recognition in young and older adults.Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):335-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03193411. Mem Cognit. 2006. PMID: 16752597
-
Recollection rejection: gist cuing of verbatim memory.Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1422-30. doi: 10.3758/bf03193375. Mem Cognit. 2005. PMID: 16615390
-
50 years of research sparked by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968).Mem Cognit. 2019 May;47(4):561-574. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00896-7. Mem Cognit. 2019. PMID: 30689198 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources