Isotypic and clonal variations in the interactions between model monoclonal immune complexes and the human erythrocyte CR1 receptor
- PMID: 1386141
- DOI: 10.1016/0161-5890(92)90132-h
Isotypic and clonal variations in the interactions between model monoclonal immune complexes and the human erythrocyte CR1 receptor
Abstract
Erythrocytes (E) play a central role in handling circulating immune complexes (IC) in primates. E capture IC via complement receptors, type 1 (CR1) which can bind to C3b and C4b ligand sites generated on IC during activation of the complement cascade. The present study was designed to explore how the immunochemical properties of IC affected their interactions with human E. Model IC were constructed by combining murine monoclonal anti-dinitrophenyl (DNP) antibodies with DNP-bovine serum albumin. A panel of 10 independently-derived monoclonal IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM and IgA antibodies were used to construct IC and their interactions with human E were examined in vitro. The data reveal that IC constructed with the different monoclonal antibodies differed with respect to their rate of binding to E, the peak magnitude of IC binding to E, and the rate and extent of IC release from E. IC containing IgG1 antibodies (IgG1 IC), IgG2a IC, IgG2b IC, and IgA IC all bound rapidly to E, whereas IgG3 IC and IgM IC were bound relatively slowly to E. The peak magnitude of IC binding to E correlated directly with their binding rate. There was an inverse correlation between the antigen/antibody ratio of the IC and the magnitude of IC binding to E. The rate of release of the various types of IC from E also differed. IgG2a IC and IgG2b IC displayed the most rapid maximum release rates while IgG3 IC had the slowest peak release rate. IgM IC and IgA IC were also released relatively slowly from E. IgG1 IC had an intermediate release rate. There was no direct correlation between the maximum release rate and either the maximum binding rate or the peak magnitude of IC binding to E. While there were some clonotypic differences in binding and release rates between IC made with different IgG2a, IgG3 and IgM antibodies, antibody isotype appears to be of fundamental importance with respect to both the binding of IC to E and the release of IC from E. These data indicate that the immunochemical properties of IC can profoundly affect their interactions with human E and that the panel of IC constructed with monoclonal antibodies can serve as a useful model to explore these interactions.
Similar articles
-
Relationship between immune complex binding and release and the quantitative expression of the complement receptor, type 1 (CR1, CD35) on human erythrocytes.Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1994 Feb;70(2):104-13. doi: 10.1006/clin.1994.1017. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1994. PMID: 8299225
-
Differential susceptibility of immune complexes to release from the erythrocyte CR1 receptor by factor I.Mol Immunol. 1994 Feb;31(3):227-40. doi: 10.1016/0161-5890(94)90003-5. Mol Immunol. 1994. PMID: 8114768
-
The effect of antibody isotype and antigenic epitope density on the complement-fixing activity of immune complexes: a systematic study using chimaeric anti-NIP antibodies with human Fc regions.Clin Exp Immunol. 1991 Apr;84(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1991.tb08115.x. Clin Exp Immunol. 1991. PMID: 1707767 Free PMC article.
-
How are immune complexes bound to the primate erythrocyte complement receptor transferred to acceptor phagocytic cells?Mol Immunol. 1999 Sep-Oct;36(13-14):827-35. doi: 10.1016/s0161-5890(99)00103-0. Mol Immunol. 1999. PMID: 10698336 Review.
-
Factors influencing the endocytosis of immune complexes.Adv Nephrol Necker Hosp. 1984;13:341-67. Adv Nephrol Necker Hosp. 1984. PMID: 6236677 Review.
Cited by
-
Clonal variations in complement activation and deposition of C3b and C4b on model immune complexes.Immunology. 1993 Oct;80(2):168-76. Immunology. 1993. PMID: 8262546 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous