Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials
- PMID: 1387078
- DOI: 10.1080/00140139208967379
Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials
Abstract
A series of psychophysical lifting studies was conducted to establish maximum acceptable weights of lift (MAWL) for three supply items commonly handled in underground coal mines (rock dust bags, ventilation stopping blocks, and crib blocks). Each study utilized 12 subjects, all of whom had considerable experience working in underground coal mines. Effects of lifting in four postures (standing, stooping under a 1.5 m ceiling, stooping under a 1.2 m ceiling, and kneeling) were investigated together with four lifting conditions (combinations of lifting symmetry and lifting height). The frequency of lifting was set at four per min, and the task duration was 15 min. Posture significantly affected the MAWL for the rock dust bag (standing MAWL was 7% greater than restricted postures and kneeling MAWL was 6.4% less than stopped); however, posture interacted with lifting conditions for both of the other materials. Physiological costs were found to be significantly greater in the stooped postures compared with kneeling for all materials. Other contrasts (standing versus restricted postures, stooping under 1.5 m ceiling versus stopping under 1.2 m ceiling) did not exhibit significantly different levels of energy expenditure. Energy expenditure was significantly affected by vertical lifting height; however, the plane of lifting had little influence on metabolic cost. Recommended acceptable workloads for the three materials are 20.0 kg for the rock dust bag, 16.5 kg for the ventilation stopping block, and 14.7 kg for the crib block. These results suggest that miners are often required to lift supplies that are substantially heavier than psychophysically acceptable lifting limits.
Similar articles
-
Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures.Ergonomics. 1991 Jul;34(7):939-52. doi: 10.1080/00140139108964836. Ergonomics. 1991. PMID: 1915255
-
Lifting in four restricted lifting conditions: psychophysical, physiological and biomechanical effects of lifting in stooped and kneeling postures.Appl Ergon. 1990 Sep;21(3):237-45. Appl Ergon. 1990. PMID: 15676780
-
Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task.Ergonomics. 2002 Apr 15;45(5):380-98. doi: 10.1080/00140130210127639. Ergonomics. 2002. PMID: 12028722 Clinical Trial.
-
Physical limitations and musculoskeletal complaints associated with work in unusual or restricted postures: a literature review.J Safety Res. 2005;36(1):51-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.12.001. J Safety Res. 2005. PMID: 15752483 Review.
-
A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.Ergonomics. 1989 Sep;32(9):1125-44. doi: 10.1080/00140138908966879. Ergonomics. 1989. PMID: 2680481 Review.
Cited by
-
Examination of space/volume requirements for US underground coal mine refuge alternatives.Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2017;18(5):388-403. doi: 10.1080/1463922X.2015.1130878. Epub 2017 Jun 22. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2017. PMID: 28845133 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of low back pain and associated occupational factors among Chinese coal miners.BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 1;12:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-149. BMC Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22375934 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical