Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients
- PMID: 1389276
Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that all prosthetic valves are at least mildly stenotic and may cause relatively high pressure gradients despite normal prosthesis function; such gradients could be due to a mismatch between prosthesis effective orifice area and patient's body size. In order to address this problem more directly, we derived, using a physiologic pulse duplicator system, the theoretical relations between transprosthetic pressure gradients and prosthesis effective orifice areas indexed for body surface area, assuming a normal resting cardiac index of 3.0 l/min m-2 and 10-50% increases in stroke volume such as may occur during maximal upright exercise. These exponential relations show that a small decrease in indexed effective orifice area produces a large increase in pressure gradient, and that the indexed effective orifice area should ideally be not less than 0.9-1.0 cm2/m2 for aortic prostheses and 1.3-1.5 cm2/m2 for mitral prostheses in order to minimize postoperative gradients. Thus, high postoperative gradients do not necessarily indicate intrinsic prosthesis dysfunction but may also be due to patient prosthesis mismatch. Intrinsic prosthetic performance is best assessed by comparing in vivo calculated effective orifice areas to in vitro measurements for same type and size of prosthesis. Patient prosthesis mismatch can be avoided by calculating before operation the projected indexed effective orifice area of the prosthesis being implanted.
Similar articles
-
The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status.Can J Cardiol. 1996 Apr;12(4):379-87. Can J Cardiol. 1996. PMID: 8608457 Review.
-
[Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses].G Ital Cardiol. 1988 Feb;18(2):121-34. G Ital Cardiol. 1988. PMID: 3410201 Italian.
-
Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 May;133(5):1234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.074. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007. PMID: 17467435
-
In vitro hydrodynamic comparison of mitral valve prostheses at high flow rates.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1978 Dec;76(6):771-87. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1978. PMID: 713584
-
Manufacturer-provided effective orifice area index charts and the prevention of prosthesis-patient mismatch.J Heart Valve Dis. 2012 Jan;21(1):107-11. J Heart Valve Dis. 2012. PMID: 22474751 Review.
Cited by
-
The Quebec Heart Institute: 50 years of excellence in cardiology.Can J Cardiol. 2007 Oct;23 Suppl B(Suppl B):5B-8B. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)71004-8. Can J Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17932581 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and Technical Challenges of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 4;8:670457. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.670457. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021. PMID: 34150868 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Left ventricular outflow obstruction predicts increase in systolic pressure gradients and blood residence time after transcatheter mitral valve replacement.Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 19;8(1):15540. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33836-7. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30341365 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter Aortic and Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantation Using the Edwards Sapien 3 Heart Valve.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 7;7(14):e007767. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007767. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29982230 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention.Heart. 2006 Aug;92(8):1022-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.067363. Epub 2005 Oct 26. Heart. 2006. PMID: 16251232 Free PMC article. Review.