A randomised double-blind study of high-dose intravenous prochlorperazine versus high-dose metoclopramide as antiemetics for cancer chemotherapy
- PMID: 1389512
- DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90006-n
A randomised double-blind study of high-dose intravenous prochlorperazine versus high-dose metoclopramide as antiemetics for cancer chemotherapy
Abstract
High-dose prochlorperazine 0.8 mg/kg administered intravenously 30 min pre and 7 h 30 min post the initial dose of emetogenic chemotherapy was compared to high-dose metoclopramide 2 mg/kg over 20 min every 2 h for five doses starting 30 min prior to chemotherapy in a randomised, double-blind, parallel subjects design study. On the prochlorperazine arm intravenous dextrose placebos every 2 h maintained blinding. Complete suppression of vomiting occurred in 42% on metoclopramide (53% with non-cisplatin regimens) and 36% on prochlorperazine (52% with non-cisplatin-containing regimens) while major responses (2 or less vomits) occurred in 58% on metoclopramide and 54% on prochlorperazine. In patients who vomited after cisplatin, prochlorperazine achieved a significantly shorter duration of vomiting, a median of 5 h compared to 15 h on metoclopramide (P = 0.03). The response rate to prochlorperazine for cisplatin-induced emesis between 12 and 24 h was significantly better than for metoclopramide (prochlorperazine = 0.02). Toxicities were equivalent except for significantly greater sedation and dry mouth on prochlorperazine. Extrapyramidal reactions were recorded equally on both arms but were only severe enough to stop treatment on metoclopramide. The metoclopramide regimen was five times as expensive as prochlorperazine. High-dose prochlorperazine is an active and cost-effective antiemetic.
Similar articles
-
Randomized, double-blind comparison of a prochlorperazine-based versus a metoclopramide-based antiemetic regimen in patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation.Cancer. 1995 Dec 1;76(11):2330-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19951201)76:11<2330::aid-cncr2820761122>3.0.co;2-f. Cancer. 1995. PMID: 8635039 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized trial of oral nabilone and prochlorperazine compared to intravenous metoclopramide and dexamethasone in the treatment of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy regimens containing cisplatin or cisplatin analogues.Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1988 Apr;24(4):685-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(88)90300-8. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1988. PMID: 2838294 Clinical Trial.
-
Antiemetic efficacy of high-dose metoclopramide: randomized trials with placebo and prochlorperazine in patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.N Engl J Med. 1981 Oct 15;305(16):905-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198110153051601. N Engl J Med. 1981. PMID: 7024807 Clinical Trial.
-
[Recent advances in the management of chemotherapy-induced emesis].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1986 Mar;13(3 Pt 1):401-11. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1986. PMID: 3006594 Review. Japanese.
-
[Recent improvements in antiemetic therapy].Tumori. 1997;83(2 Suppl):S3-14. Tumori. 1997. PMID: 9235727 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and gastroenteritis.Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2011 May;29(2):211-37, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2011.01.005. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2011. PMID: 21515177 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in the Older Patient: Optimizing Outcomes.Drugs Aging. 2022 Jan;39(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s40266-021-00909-8. Epub 2021 Dec 9. Drugs Aging. 2022. PMID: 34882284 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dose-finding study of oral metopimazine.Support Care Cancer. 1997 Jan;5(1):38-43. doi: 10.1007/BF01681960. Support Care Cancer. 1997. PMID: 9010988 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical