Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Apr;76(4):221-4.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.76.4.221.

Cystoid macular oedema following cataract extraction in patients with diabetes

Affiliations

Cystoid macular oedema following cataract extraction in patients with diabetes

A Pollack et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992 Apr.

Abstract

The course of cystoid macular oedema (CMO) following extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation was prospectively studied in 44 eyes of 44 consecutive diabetic patients without preoperative CMO. In 50% of eyes CMO was observed 6 weeks after surgery and in 25% was still present at 1 year. The preoperative presence of diabetic retinopathy significantly affected the postoperative onset and persistence of CMO. CMO occurred postoperatively in only 32% of eyes without pre-existing diabetic retinopathy and in 81% of eyes with pre-existing diabetic retinopathy (p < 0.05). CMO persisted at 1 year after surgery in only 7% of eyes without pre-existing diabetic retinopathy and in 56% of eyes in which diabetic retinopathy persisted (p < 0.01). Angiographic CMO (that is, detectable only on fluorescein angiography) was more common than clinical CMO (detectable on ophthalmoscopic examination as well) in eyes with no pre-existing diabetic retinopathy, whereas clinical CMO was seen more often than angiographic CMO when diabetic retinopathy was present preoperatively (p < 0.01). The course and final visual outcome of angiographic CMO were more favourable than in clinical CMO. Final visual acuity of at least 6/12 was achieved in 86% of eyes with angiographic CMO and in only 33% of eyes with clinical CMO. On the basis of the above findings we believe that cataract extraction should not be recommended for eyes with pre-existing diabetic retinopathy until the vision has deteriorated to at least 6/30-6/60.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Dec;88(6):990-2 - PubMed
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991 Sep;75(9):547-51 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1989 May;96(5):603-10 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1985 Mar;92(3):366-9 - PubMed
    1. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984 Jul-Aug;29(1):1-54 - PubMed