Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Sep 12;305(6854):621-4.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6854.621.

Assessment of patients aged over 75 in general practice

Affiliations

Assessment of patients aged over 75 in general practice

J Tremellen. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the assessment scheme for people aged 75, to establish doctors' and nurses' views on the value of the assessment scheme, and to seek patients' opinions on elderly assessments.

Design: Data on the assessment process were collected from individual practices. Questionnaires were sent to doctors and practice nurses undertaking assessments and to a sample of elderly patients.

Subjects: 31,565 patients aged 75 and over and all doctors registered with Wiltshire Family Health Services Authority, as well as practice nurses assessing elderly patients. A 2% random sample of elderly patients was selected to answer questions on patient satisfaction.

Main outcome measures: Numbers of patients accepting the invitation for assessment, who carried out the assessments and where, what unmet needs were identified, and by whom.

Results: 20,192 patients (64%) accepted the assessment offer. Doctors carried out 8786 assessments and nurses 10,779. Although 12,317 (61%) were carried out in the home, nurses did most domiciliary assessments (7122/11,883). Nurses with extra qualifications identified the highest number of unmet needs (400/1000 visits). 155 of 228 (68%) doctors thought assessments unnecessary whereas 25 of 48 (52%) of nurses thought them important. 93% of patients found assessment useful.

Conclusions: Doctors see no merit in the scheme; most undertake assessments opportunistically and pick up few new problems. Nurses who see it as important require further training to fit them to do home visits confidently. Patients who were assessed found it worth while. The case for developing a specialist community nurse for elderly people should be investigated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Health checks for people over 75.
    Harris A. Harris A. BMJ. 1992 Sep 12;305(6854):599-600. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6854.599. BMJ. 1992. PMID: 1298230 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Assessment of patients over 75.
    Sparkes T, Harrison R, Hargreaves S, Wallace P. Sparkes T, et al. BMJ. 1992 Oct 17;305(6859):958. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6859.958. BMJ. 1992. PMID: 1458102 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Health checks for people over 75.
    Barker A, Betmouni S, Harrison M, Jones R. Barker A, et al. BMJ. 1992 Oct 31;305(6861):1098-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6861.1098-c. BMJ. 1992. PMID: 1467710 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Lancet. 1964 May 23;1(7343):1117-20 - PubMed
    1. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 Jan;30(210):49-51 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Dec 1;289(6457):1522-4 - PubMed
    1. Midwife Health Visit Community Nurse. 1979 Nov;15(11):457-9 - PubMed
    1. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1979 Dec;29(209):733-40 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources