Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements
- PMID: 1397752
- DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199206000-00001
Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements
Abstract
The goals of this investigation were to determine whether hearing aid benefit improved significantly over the first 10 weeks of hearing aid use and whether time-related changes in benefit (if any) were affected by the type of benefit measurement (i.e., objective or subjective). A total of 17 hearing-impaired subjects participated, with different subjects completing different phases of the study. Benefit was measured soon after the hearing aid fitting and again after 10 weeks of adjustment to hearing aid use. Objective benefit data were determined using the Connected Speech Test. No significant changes in objective benefit were noted in noisy or reverberant listening environments when visual cues were available. However, in a low-noise setting and in a noisy setting without visual cues, improvements in objective benefit were seen over time. Subjective benefit data were derived from responses to the Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. These data indicated significant benefit improvement over time in all five types of daily life situations assessed, although the improvement was small in reverberant and noisy environments. Significant, but modest, correlations were found between objective and subjective data for low-noise and reverberant listening environments. Comparison of experienced and novice hearing aid wearers suggested that although experienced wearers obtain more benefit than novice wearers, they evidence similar time-related changes in benefit during the first 10 weeks of new hearing aid use.
Similar articles
-
Prediction of benefit from linear hearing aids in nonreverberant listening environments.Ear Hear. 1993 Aug;14(4):275-84. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199308000-00006. Ear Hear. 1993. PMID: 8405731
-
The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.Ear Hear. 2012 Sep-Oct;33(5):604-14. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825641e4. Ear Hear. 2012. PMID: 22677815
-
Hearing aid benefit in everyday environments.Ear Hear. 1991 Apr;12(2):127-39. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199104000-00009. Ear Hear. 1991. PMID: 2065838
-
Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.Int J Audiol. 2012 Sep;51(9):678-88. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.692822. Epub 2012 Jun 26. Int J Audiol. 2012. PMID: 22731922
-
Benefit acclimatization in elderly hearing aid users.J Am Acad Audiol. 1996 Dec;7(6):428-41. J Am Acad Audiol. 1996. PMID: 8972444
Cited by
-
Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort.Psychophysiology. 2014 Oct;51(10):1046-57. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12242. Epub 2014 Jun 9. Psychophysiology. 2014. PMID: 24909603 Free PMC article.
-
NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.Trends Amplif. 2012 Dec;16(4):211-23. doi: 10.1177/1084713812468511. Epub 2012 Nov 30. Trends Amplif. 2012. PMID: 23203416 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association Between Unaided Speech Perception in Noise and Hearing Aid Use Mediated by Perceived Benefit.Audiol Res. 2025 May 1;15(3):50. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15030050. Audiol Res. 2025. PMID: 40407664 Free PMC article.
-
Hearing aid Experiences of Adult Hearing aid Owners During and After Fitting: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165221130584. doi: 10.1177/23312165221130584. Trends Hear. 2022. PMID: 36300258 Free PMC article.
-
Relationships between self-report and cognitive measures of hearing aid outcome.Speech Lang Hear. 2013 Dec;16(4):197-207. doi: 10.1179/205057113X13782848890774. Speech Lang Hear. 2013. PMID: 26213622 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical