Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1963 May;17(2):299-313.
doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.2.299.

Quantitative studies of the growth of mouse embryo cells in culture and their development into established lines

Quantitative studies of the growth of mouse embryo cells in culture and their development into established lines

G J TODARO et al. J Cell Biol. 1963 May.

Abstract

Disaggregated mouse embryo cells, grown in monolayers, underwent a progressive decline in growth rate upon successive transfer, the rapidity of the decline depending, among other things, on the inoculation density. Nevertheless, nearly all cultures developed into established lines within 3 months of culture. The first sign of the emergence of an established line was the ability of the cells to maintain a constant or rising potential growth rate. This occurred while the cultures were morphologically unchanged. The growth rate continued to increase until it equaled or exceeded that of the original culture. The early established cells showed an increasing metabolic autonomy, as indicated by decreasing dependence on cell-to-cell feeding. It is suggested that the process of establishment involves an alteration in cell permeability properties. Chromosome studies indicated that the cells responsible for the upturn in growth rate were diploid, but later the population shifted to the tetraploid range, often very rapidly. Still later, marker chromosomes appeared. Different lines acquired different properties, depending on the culture conditions employed; one line developed which is extremely sensitive to contact inhibition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1951 Aug;12(1):133-53 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1961 Dec 23;192:1214-5 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Zool. 1959 Oct-Dec;142:507-20 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 1961 Aug;21:885-94 - PubMed
    1. Virology. 1962 Feb;16:147-51 - PubMed