Validity of phallometric measures with sex offenders: comments on the Quinsey, Laws, and Hall debate
- PMID: 1401400
- DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.60.5.812
Validity of phallometric measures with sex offenders: comments on the Quinsey, Laws, and Hall debate
Abstract
In a recent debate, Quinsey and Laws (1990) and Hall (1990) discussed several major methodological issues in research on the validity of phallometric tests. This article examines specific points of the debate more closely and uncovers questionable assumptions underlying some of the Quinsey and Laws criticisms. The implications of unresolved problems for the clinical use of phallometric measures are stressed.
Comment on
-
Validity of physiological measures of pedophilic sexual arousal in a sexual offender population: a critique of Hall, Proctor, and Nelson.J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990 Dec;58(6):886-91. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.58.6.886. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990. PMID: 2292642
-
Validity of physiological measures of pedophilic sexual arousal in a sexual offender population.J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Feb;56(1):118-22. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.56.1.118. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988. PMID: 3346436 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
