Physiologic changes with maximal exercise in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler echocardiography
- PMID: 1401617
- DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90373-u
Physiologic changes with maximal exercise in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler echocardiography
Abstract
Objectives: We hypothesized that the physiologic response to exercise in valvular aortic stenosis could be measured by Doppler echocardiography.
Background: Data on exercise hemodynamics in patients with aortic stenosis are limited, yet Doppler echocardiography provides accurate, noninvasive measures of stenosis severity.
Methods: In 28 asymptomatic subjects with aortic stenosis maximal treadmill exercise testing was performed with Doppler recordings of left ventricular outflow tract and aortic jet velocities immediately before and after exercise. Maximal and mean volume flow rate (Qmax and Qmean), stroke volume, cardiac output, maximal and mean aortic jet velocity (Vmax, Vmean), mean pressure gradient (delta P) and continuity equation aortic valve area were calculated at rest and after exercise. The actual change from rest to exercise in Qmax and Vmax was compared with the predicted relation between these variables for a given orifice area. Subjects were classified into two groups: Group I (rest-exercise Vmax/Qmax slope > 0, n = 19) and Group II (slope < or = 0, n = 9).
Results: Mean exercise duration was 6.7 +/- 4.3 min. With exercise, Vmax increased from 3.99 +/- 0.93 to 4.61 +/- 1.12 m/s (p < 0.0001) and mean delta P increased from 39 +/- 20 to 52 +/- 26 mm Hg (p < 0.0001). Qmax rose with exercise (422 +/- 117 to 523 +/- 209 ml/s, p < 0.0001), but the systolic ejection period decreased (0.33 +/- 0.04 to 0.24 +/- 0.04, p < 0.0001), so that stroke volume decreased slightly (98 +/- 29 to 89 +/- 32 ml, p = 0.01). The increase in cardiac output with exercise (6.5 +/- 1.7 to 10.2 +/- 4.4 liters/min, p < 0.0001) was mediated by increased heart rate (71 +/- 17 to 147 +/- 28 beats/min, p < 0.0001). There was no significant change in the mean aortic valve area with exercise (1.17 +/- 0.45 to 1.28 +/- 0.65, p = 0.06). Compared with Group I patients, patients with a rest-exercise slope < or = 0 (Group II) tended to be older (69 +/- 12 vs. 58 +/- 19 years, p = 0.07) and had a trend toward a shorter exercise duration (5.3 +/- 2.9 vs. 7.3 +/- 4.9 min, p = 0.20). There was no difference between groups for heart rate at rest, blood pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, Vmax, mean delta P or aortic valve area. With exercise, Group II subjects had a lower cardiac output (7.4 +/- 2.4 vs. 11.5 +/- 4.6 liters/min, p = 0.005) and a smaller percent increase in Vmax (3 +/- 9% vs. 22 +/- 14%, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Doppler echocardiography allows assessment of physiologic changes with exercise in adults with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. A majority of subjects show a rest-exercise response that closely parallels the predicted relation between Vmax and Qmax for a given orifice area. The potential utility of this approach for elucidating the relation between hemodynamic severity and clinical symptoms deserves further study.
Similar articles
-
Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Nov 1;24(5):1342-50. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90118-x. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994. PMID: 7930259 Clinical Trial.
-
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Aortic Stenosis.Dan Med J. 2017 May;64(5):B5352. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28552098
-
Association Between Left Atrial Dilatation and Invasive Hemodynamics at Rest and During Exercise in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Oct;9(10):e005156. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005156. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. PMID: 27894069
-
Stress echocardiography beyond coronary artery disease.Eur Heart J. 1997 Jun;18 Suppl D:D130-7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/18.suppl_d.130. Eur Heart J. 1997. PMID: 9183622 Review.
-
Evolution of the continuity equation in the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the severity of valvular aortic stenosis.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1990 Jul-Aug;3(4):326-30. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(14)80317-9. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1990. PMID: 2206551 Review.
Cited by
-
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 29;13(15):2527. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152527. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37568890 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Insights into the mechanism of paradoxical low-flow, low-pressure gradient severe aortic stenosis: association with reduced O2 consumption by the whole body.Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019 Apr 1;316(4):H840-H848. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00715.2018. Epub 2019 Jan 25. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019. PMID: 30681367 Free PMC article.
-
Multimodality Imaging in Valvular Structural Interventions.Card Fail Rev. 2022 Nov 18;8:e31. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2022.10. eCollection 2022 Jan. Card Fail Rev. 2022. PMID: 36644647 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New concepts in valvular hemodynamics: implications for diagnosis and treatment of aortic stenosis.Can J Cardiol. 2007 Oct;23 Suppl B(Suppl B):40B-47B. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)71009-7. Can J Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17932586 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Concomitant Mitral Regurgitation on the Hemodynamic Indicators of Aortic Stenosis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Feb 21;12(4):e025648. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025648. Epub 2023 Feb 15. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023. PMID: 36789874 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical