Variability in ECG computer interpretation. Analysis of individual complexes vs analysis of a representative complex
- PMID: 1402511
- DOI: 10.1016/0022-0736(92)90031-t
Variability in ECG computer interpretation. Analysis of individual complexes vs analysis of a representative complex
Abstract
Variability in the electrocardiogram (ECG) can be due to extrinsic noise or can be caused by intrinsic factors, such as changes in the volume conductor or in the heart itself. Computer programs for the interpretation of the ECG base their diagnostic classification on one set of measurements that is derived from a representative PQRST complex or that is computed by taking the median from the measurements for each complex in the recording. However, these methods may fail to do justice to the intrinsic variability that may be present in the ECG. An alternative method is proposed: derive a set of measurements from each complex in the recording, classify each individual complex separately, and then combine the individual classifications into one final classification. This procedure has been evaluated on a validated database (n = 1,220) using an ECG computer program. Total accuracy against the clinical evidence increased from 69.8% for the interpretations of the averaged complexes to 71.2% for the combined interpretations of the individual complexes (p < 0.001). The effect of beat-to-beat variation on the measurements and classifications is demonstrated and the influence of extrinsic and intrinsic variability is assessed.
Similar articles
-
Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 1):513-7. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001. PMID: 11604793
-
Improvement of automated electrocardiographic diagnosis by combination of computer interpretations of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.Am J Cardiol. 1992 Jul 1;70(1):96-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91397-m. Am J Cardiol. 1992. PMID: 1615877
-
Combination of diagnostic classifications from ECG and VCG computer interpretations.J Electrocardiol. 1992;25 Suppl:126-30. doi: 10.1016/0022-0736(92)90078-e. J Electrocardiol. 1992. PMID: 1297678
-
Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society.Heart Rhythm. 2007 Mar;4(3):394-412. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.01.027. Epub 2007 Feb 1. Heart Rhythm. 2007. PMID: 17341413 Review.
-
Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Mar 13;49(10):1109-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.024. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17349896 Review.
Cited by
-
Magnitude, mechanism, and reproducibility of QT interval differences between superimposed global and individual lead ECG complexes.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2007 Apr;12(2):145-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2007.00153.x. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2007. PMID: 17593183 Free PMC article.
-
ECG data compression using a neural network model based on multi-objective optimization.PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0182500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182500. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28972986 Free PMC article.
-
Consensus development for healthcare professionals.Intern Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;10(3):373-83. doi: 10.1007/s11739-014-1156-6. Epub 2014 Nov 28. Intern Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 25430678 Free PMC article.